Universität Hohenheim, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Universität Hohenheim (440e), Garbenstrasse 9, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.049. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
Biogas will be of increasing importance in the future as a factor in reducing greenhouse gas emissions cost-efficiently by the optimal use of available resources and technologies. The goal of this study was to identify the most ecological and economical use of a given resource (organic waste from residential, commercial and industry sectors) using one specific treatment technology (anaerobic digestion) but applying different energy conversion technologies. Average and marginal abatement costs were calculated based on Life Cycle Cost (LCC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodologies. Eight new biogas systems producing electricity, heat, gas or automotive fuel were analyzed in order to identify the most cost-efficient way of reducing GHG emissions. A system using a combined heat and power station (which is connected to waste treatment and digestion operation facilities and located nearby potential residential, commercial or industrial heat users) was found to be the most cost-efficient biogas technology for reducing GHG emissions. Up to € 198 per tonne of CO(2) equivalents can be saved by replacing the "business as usual" systems based on fossil resources with ones based on biogas. Limited gas injection (desulfurized and dried biogas, without compression and upgrading) into the gas grid can also be a viable option with an abatement cost saving of € 72 per tonne of CO(2) equivalents, while a heating plant with a district heating grid or a system based on biogas results in higher abatement costs (€ 267 and € 270 per tonne CO(2) eq). Results from all systems are significantly influenced by whether average or marginal data are used as a reference. Beside that energy efficiency, the reference system that was replaced and the by-products as well as feedstock and investment costs were identified to be parameters with major impacts on abatement costs. The quantitative analysis was completed by a discussion of the role that abatement cost methodology can play in decision-making.
沼气将在未来作为一个因素变得越来越重要,通过优化利用现有资源和技术,以具有成本效益的方式减少温室气体排放。本研究的目的是确定给定资源(住宅、商业和工业部门的有机废物)的最生态和经济的利用方式,使用一种特定的处理技术(厌氧消化),但应用不同的能源转换技术。平均和边际减排成本是根据生命周期成本(LCC)和生命周期评估(LCA)方法计算的。为了确定减少温室气体排放的最具成本效益的方法,分析了 8 种新型沼气系统,用于生产电力、热能、气体或汽车燃料。发现使用热电联产(CHP)的系统是最具成本效益的减少温室气体排放的沼气技术,该系统连接到废物处理和消化操作设施,并位于潜在的住宅、商业或工业热用户附近。通过用基于沼气的系统取代基于化石资源的“常规”系统,可以节省高达 198 欧元/吨二氧化碳当量。有限的沼气注入(脱硫和干燥沼气,无需压缩和升级)到天然气管网也是可行的选择,减排成本节省 72 欧元/吨二氧化碳当量,而带有区域供热网的供热厂或基于沼气的系统则导致更高的减排成本(267 欧元/吨和 270 欧元/吨二氧化碳当量)。所有系统的结果都受到使用平均值还是边际值作为参考的显著影响。除了能源效率之外,被替换的参考系统以及副产品、原料和投资成本被确定为对减排成本有重大影响的参数。通过讨论减排成本方法在决策中的作用,完成了对定量分析的补充。