• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证用于区分不确定肺部结节临床意义的血浆生物标志物组合。

Development and validation of a plasma biomarker panel for discerning clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Jan;8(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31827627f8.

DOI:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31827627f8
PMID:23201823
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The recent findings of the National Lung Screening Trial showed 24.2% of individuals at high risk for lung cancer having one or more indeterminate nodules detected by low-dose computed tomography-based screening, 96.4% of which were eventually confirmed as false positives. These positive scans necessitate additional diagnostic procedures to establish a definitive diagnosis that adds cost and risk to the paradigm. A plasma test able to assign benign versus malignant pathology in high-risk patients would be an invaluable tool to complement low-dose computed tomography-based screening and promote its rapid implementation.

METHODS

We evaluated 17 biomarkers, previously shown to have value in detecting lung cancer, against a discovery cohort, comprising benign (n = 67) cases and lung cancer (n = 69) cases. A Random Forest method based analysis was used to identify the optimal biomarker panel for assigning disease status, which was then validated against a cohort from the Mayo Clinic, comprising patients with benign (n = 61) or malignant (n = 20) indeterminate lung nodules.

RESULTS

Our discovery efforts produced a seven-analyte plasma biomarker panel consisting of interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-10, IL-1ra, sIL-2Rα, stromal cell-derived factor-1α+β, tumor necrosis factor α, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 α. The sensitivity and specificity of our panel in our validation cohort is 95.0% and 23.3%, respectively. The validated negative predictive value of our panel was 93.8%.

CONCLUSION

We developed a seven-analyte plasma biomarker panel able to identify benign nodules, otherwise deemed indeterminate, with a high degree of accuracy. This panel may have clinical utility in risk-stratifying screen-detected lung nodules, decrease unnecessary follow-up imaging or invasive procedures, and potentially avoid unnecessary morbidity, mortality, and health care costs.

摘要

简介

最近的全国肺癌筛查试验结果显示,24.2%的肺癌高危人群通过低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查检测到一个或多个不确定结节,其中 96.4%最终被确认为假阳性。这些阳性扫描需要额外的诊断程序来确定明确的诊断,这给该模式增加了成本和风险。一种能够在高危患者中确定良性与恶性病理的血浆检测方法将是一种非常有价值的工具,可以补充低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查,并促进其快速实施。

方法

我们评估了 17 种生物标志物,这些标志物以前被证明在检测肺癌方面具有价值,针对一个由良性(n=67)病例和肺癌(n=69)病例组成的发现队列。使用基于随机森林方法的分析来确定用于分配疾病状态的最佳生物标志物组合,然后用来自梅奥诊所的一个队列进行验证,该队列包括良性(n=61)或恶性(n=20)不确定的肺结节患者。

结果

我们的发现工作产生了一个由七个分析物组成的血浆生物标志物组合,包括白细胞介素 6(IL-6)、白细胞介素 10(IL-10)、白细胞介素 1 受体拮抗剂(IL-1ra)、可溶性白细胞介素 2 受体α(sIL-2Rα)、基质细胞衍生因子-1α+β(stromal cell-derived factor-1α+β)、肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factor α)和巨噬细胞炎性蛋白 1α(macrophage inflammatory protein 1α)。我们验证队列中我们的组合的灵敏度和特异性分别为 95.0%和 23.3%。我们的组合的验证阴性预测值为 93.8%。

结论

我们开发了一种能够以高度准确性识别良性结节的七分析物血浆生物标志物组合,否则这些结节被认为是不确定的。该组合可能具有在筛选检测到的肺结节中进行风险分层的临床实用性,减少不必要的随访影像学或侵入性程序,并可能避免不必要的发病率、死亡率和医疗保健成本。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a plasma biomarker panel for discerning clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules.开发和验证用于区分不确定肺部结节临床意义的血浆生物标志物组合。
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Jan;8(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31827627f8.
2
Value of circulating insulin-like growth factor-associated proteins for the detection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.循环胰岛素样生长因子相关蛋白在I期非小细胞肺癌检测中的价值
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):727-34.e1-3; discussion 734. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.085. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
3
Angiogenesis Biomarkers May Be Useful in the Management of Patients With Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules.血管生成生物标志物可能有助于不确定肺结节患者的管理。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;100(2):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
4
Autoantibody Signature Enhances the Positive Predictive Power of Computed Tomography and Nodule-Based Risk Models for Detection of Lung Cancer.自身抗体特征增强了计算机断层扫描和基于结节的风险模型对肺癌检测的阳性预测能力。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Mar;12(3):578-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.143. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
5
Combining serum miRNAs, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 with imaging and clinical features to distinguish benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: a pilot study : Xianfeng Li et al.: Combining biomarker, imaging, and clinical features to distinguish pulmonary nodules.联合血清微小RNA、癌胚抗原和细胞角蛋白19片段与影像学及临床特征鉴别肺结节的良恶性:一项初步研究:李先锋等人:联合生物标志物、影像学和临床特征鉴别肺结节
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 May 25;15(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1171-y.
6
[Value of Combined Detection of Cytokines and Tumor Markers in the 
Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules].[细胞因子与肿瘤标志物联合检测在孤立性肺结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 20;24(6):426-433. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.20.
7
DNA methylation of PTGER4 in peripheral blood plasma helps to distinguish between lung cancer, benign pulmonary nodules and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.外周血血浆中 PTGER4 的 DNA 甲基化有助于区分肺癌、良性肺结节和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Apr;147:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
A Gene Expression Classifier from Whole Blood Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Lung Nodules Detected by Low-Dose CT.全血基因表达分类器可区分低剂量 CT 检测到的良恶性肺结节。
Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 1;79(1):263-273. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2032. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
9
Positron emission tomography in the diagnostic work-up of screening-detected lung nodules.正电子发射断层扫描在筛查发现的肺结节诊断中的应用。
Eur Respir J. 2015 Feb;45(2):501-10. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00066514. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
10
Establishment of a multi-analyte serum biomarker panel to identify lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.建立多分析物血清生物标志物面板以识别非小细胞肺癌中的淋巴结转移。
J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Mar;4(3):338-47. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181982abf.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiating Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy Using Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds: A Prospective Observational Study.利用呼出挥发性有机化合物鉴别肺结节的恶性程度:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(1):e70545. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70545.
2
Emerging trends and hotspots in lung cancer-prediction models research.肺癌预测模型研究的新趋势与热点
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Oct 18;86(12):7178-7192. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002648. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Update on Biomarkers for the Stratification of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules.
肺结节良恶性评估的生物标志物研究进展。
Chest. 2023 Oct;164(4):1028-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Comparing modalities for risk assessment in patients with pulmonary lesions and nondiagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected lung cancer.比较肺病变患者和疑似肺癌行支气管镜检查但未能明确诊断患者的风险评估方法。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02181-x.
5
Lung cancer risk prediction models based on pulmonary nodules: A systematic review.基于肺结节的肺癌风险预测模型:系统综述。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Mar;13(5):664-677. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14333. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
6
Noninvasive biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis, where do we stand?用于肺癌诊断的非侵入性生物标志物,我们目前处于什么阶段?
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jun;12(6):3317-3330. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-ndt-10.
7
FGB and FGG derived from plasma exosomes as potential biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.从血浆外泌体中提取的 FGB 和 FGG 作为潜在的生物标志物,可区分良、恶性肺结节。
Clin Exp Med. 2019 Nov;19(4):557-564. doi: 10.1007/s10238-019-00581-8. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
Plasma cytokine levels and the presence of colorectal cancer.血浆细胞因子水平与结直肠癌的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 18;14(3):e0213602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213602. eCollection 2019.
9
Blood based biomarkers beyond genomics for lung cancer screening.用于肺癌筛查的基因组学以外的血液生物标志物。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Jun;7(3):327-335. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.05.13.
10
Salivary cytokine panel indicative of non-small cell lung cancer.提示非小细胞肺癌的唾液细胞因子检测板
J Int Med Res. 2018 Sep;46(9):3570-3582. doi: 10.1177/0300060518775563. Epub 2018 Jun 19.