• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与口服孕激素治疗单纯非典型子宫内膜增生的疗效比较。

Efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral progestins in treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Reprod Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):45-50. doi: 10.1177/1933719112459243.

DOI:10.1177/1933719112459243
PMID:23203322
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of 3 progestin treatment regimens in the management of simple endometrial hyperplasia without cytological atypia in premenopausal women.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized comparative study. The study included 90 premenopausal women with histological diagnosis of simple endometrial hyperplasia (EH) without atypia, during the period from January 2010 to March 2012, at TAIBA Hospital in Kuwait. Patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups of 30 patients each receiving medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 10 mg/d; group I), norethisterone (NET, 15 mg/d; group II) for 10 days per cycle, or insertion of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; group III). Patients were reevaluated after 3 months of treatment. Patients with regression and persistence were offered the same medication they were using for another 3 months. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients requiring further treatment for another 3 months.

RESULTS

Patients in the LNG-IUS group showed the highest resolution rate (66.67%). Patients in MPA group had a resolution rate of 36.66% where the resolution rate was 40% in patients of NET group. The patients having LNG-IUS showed a regression rate of 33.3%, whereas patients receiving MPA and NET showed a regression rate of 60% and 56.67%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the 3 groups regarding the proportion of patients requiring further treatment for another 3 months (χ(2) = 6.501; P = .0387).

CONCLUSION

The LNG-IUS appears to represent an effective superior convenient treatment option for simple EH without atypia.

摘要

目的

评估 3 种孕激素治疗方案在管理无细胞学不典型的绝经前妇女单纯性子宫内膜增生症中的疗效。

研究设计

前瞻性随机对照研究。该研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 3 月期间科威特 TAIBA 医院 90 例经组织学诊断为单纯性子宫内膜增生症(EH)且无不典型的绝经前妇女。患者随机分为 3 组,每组 30 例,分别接受醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA,10 mg/d;I 组)、炔诺酮(NET,15 mg/d;II 组),每周期 10 天,或放置左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS;III 组)。治疗 3 个月后对患者进行重新评估。对于消退和持续存在的患者,提供与之前相同的药物进行另外 3 个月的治疗。该研究的主要结局是需要进一步治疗的患者比例。

结果

LNG-IUS 组患者的缓解率最高(66.67%)。MPA 组患者的缓解率为 36.66%,NET 组患者的缓解率为 40%。LNG-IUS 组患者的消退率为 33.3%,而 MPA 和 NET 组患者的消退率分别为 60%和 56.67%。3 组患者需要进一步治疗的比例存在统计学差异(χ(2) = 6.501;P =.0387)。

结论

LNG-IUS 似乎是一种有效且方便的治疗无细胞学不典型单纯性 EH 的选择。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral progestins in treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与口服孕激素治疗单纯非典型子宫内膜增生的疗效比较。
Reprod Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):45-50. doi: 10.1177/1933719112459243.
2
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗子宫内膜增生
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 6;9(9):CD012658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012658.pub2.
3
Management of Endometrial Hyperplasia With a Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System: A Korean Gynecologic-Oncology Group Study.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫内膜增生:一项韩国妇科肿瘤学组研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 May;26(4):711-5. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000669.
4
The effectiveness of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia--a long-term follow-up study.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)治疗子宫内膜增生的有效性——一项长期随访研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.02.022. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
5
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system vs oral progestins for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与口服孕激素治疗非典型子宫内膜增生的比较:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):469-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
Efficacy of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System on IVF-ET Outcomes in PCOS With Simple Endometrial Hyperplasia.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统对多囊卵巢综合征合并单纯性子宫内膜增生患者体外受精-胚胎移植结局的疗效
Reprod Sci. 2015 Jun;22(6):758-66. doi: 10.1177/1933719114561553. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study.LNG-IUS 与口服孕激素治疗子宫内膜增生症:一项长期的对照队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):2966-71. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det320. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
8
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus dydrogesterone for management of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器与炔羟孕酮治疗非典型子宫内膜增生的对比研究
Reprod Sci. 2015 Mar;22(3):329-34. doi: 10.1177/1933719114542014. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
9
Oral Progestogens Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for Treatment of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia<sup/>.口服孕激素与左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫内膜上皮内瘤变的比较
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Apr;26(4):368-373. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5774. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与醋酸甲羟孕酮口服制剂治疗无不典型子宫内膜增生的不孕患者的疗效比较。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Nov;43(5):864-870. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effects of different treatments based on the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in endometrial carcinoma and endometrial hyperplasia patients: a network meta-analysis.基于左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统的不同治疗方法在子宫内膜癌和子宫内膜增生患者中的比较效果:一项网状荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1315-1329. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07608-w. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
2
Efficacy of Oral Medications or Intrauterine Device-Delivered Progestin in Patients with Endometrial Hyperplasia with or without Atypia: A Network Meta-Analysis.口服药物或宫内节育器释放孕激素治疗有或无不典型性子宫内膜增生患者的疗效:一项网状Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 19;12(8):2980. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082980.
3
Dienogest versus norethisterone acetate in management of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.
地诺孕素与醋酸炔诺酮治疗非典型子宫内膜增生。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;308(3):947-952. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07015-7. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
4
Endometrial hyperplasia as a risk factor of endometrial cancer.子宫内膜增生作为子宫内膜癌的一个风险因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Aug;306(2):407-421. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06380-5. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统治疗子宫内膜增生
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 6;9(9):CD012658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012658.pub2.
6
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between endometrial curettage and aspiration biopsy in patients treated with progestin for endometrial hyperplasia: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study.孕激素治疗子宫内膜增生患者中刮宫术与抽吸活检的诊断准确性比较:韩国妇科肿瘤学组研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(4):e51. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e51. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(曼月乐)与醋酸甲羟孕酮治疗子宫内膜增生的比较。
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Aug;19(8):686-90.
8
Role of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in effective contraception.左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统在有效避孕中的作用。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Aug 9;7:777-85. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S36948. eCollection 2013.