• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科重症监护转运调查:团队组成与培训、动员时间及运输方式

Pediatric critical care transport survey: team composition and training, mobilization time, and mode of transportation.

作者信息

McCloskey K A, Johnston C

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Alabama, Department of Pediatrics, Birmingham 35233.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 1990 Mar;6(1):1-3.

PMID:2320480
Abstract

A survey was conducted to determine the current standard of care with regard to team composition and training, mobilization time, and vehicle use for pediatric critical care transport. An evaluation of 30 pediatric referral centers revealed that 60% provide a critical care transport team. Of those teams, the mean number of transports per year was 304. Response time ranged from 10 to 90 minutes. All teams included a physician all or most of the time; 100% of teams included a critical care nurse, and 50% always included a respiratory therapist. Ambulances alone are used in 28% of systems, with the remainder using combinations of ambulances, helicopters, and fixed wing aircraft. A proposal is presented for future standards in pediatric critical care transport with regard to the factors discussed.

摘要

开展了一项调查,以确定儿科重症监护转运在团队组成与培训、出动时间和车辆使用方面的当前护理标准。对30个儿科转诊中心的评估显示,60%的中心提供重症监护转运团队。在这些团队中,每年平均转运次数为304次。响应时间为10至90分钟。所有团队在大部分或全部时间都配备一名医生;100%的团队配备一名重症监护护士,50%的团队始终配备一名呼吸治疗师。28%的系统仅使用救护车,其余系统则使用救护车、直升机和固定翼飞机的组合。针对所讨论的因素,提出了关于儿科重症监护转运未来标准的建议。

相似文献

1
Pediatric critical care transport survey: team composition and training, mobilization time, and mode of transportation.儿科重症监护转运调查:团队组成与培训、动员时间及运输方式
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1990 Mar;6(1):1-3.
2
Missed opportunities during pediatric residency training: report of a 10-year follow-up survey in critical care transport medicine.儿科住院医师培训期间错失的机会:危重症转运医学10年随访调查结果报告
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31823ed4ab.
3
Evaluation of ground ambulance, rotor-wing, and fixed-wing aircraft services.地面救护车、旋翼机和固定翼飞机服务的评估。
Crit Care Clin. 1992 Jul;8(3):533-64.
4
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Hospital Care: Guidelines for Air and Ground Transportation of Pediatric Patients.美国儿科学会医院护理委员会:儿科患者航空和地面运输指南。
Pediatrics. 1986 Nov;78(5):943-50.
5
Pediatric and neonatal transport teams with and without a physician: a comparison of outcomes and interventions.有医生和无医生参与的儿科及新生儿转运团队:结局与干预措施的比较
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318030083d.
6
Medication use during neonatal and pediatric critical care transport.新生儿及儿科重症监护转运期间的药物使用
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1991 Jun;44(3):153-6, 166.
7
Intraosseous access in the setting of pediatric critical care transport.儿科重症监护转运中的骨内通路
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):50-3. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149137.96577.A6.
8
The critical care air transport program.重症监护空中运输项目。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7 Suppl):S370-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817e3143.
9
Resident training in pediatric critical care transport medicine: a survey of pediatric residency programs.儿科重症监护转运医学的住院医师培训:儿科住院医师项目调查
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000 Jun;16(3):166-9. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200006000-00007.
10
A cross-sectional survey of levels of care and response mechanisms for evolving critical illness in hospitalized children.一项关于住院儿童危重症病情进展的护理水平及应对机制的横断面调查。
Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):e940-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0852. Epub 2007 Mar 26.