Suppr超能文献

医学领域中卓越临床能力与榜样作用的交集。

The intersection between clinical excellence and role modeling in medicine.

作者信息

Kravet Steven J, Christmas Colleen, Durso Samuel, Parson Gregory, Burkhart Kathleen, Wright Scott

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Dec;3(4):465-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-03-04-04.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Role modeling is an integral component of medical education. The literature suggests that being a clinically excellent academic physician and serving as a role model for trainees are integrally related.

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between being considered clinically excellent and being considered an effective role model.

METHODS

Two independent surveys were administered to clinically active faculty (asked to name clinically excellent colleagues) and internal medicine residents (asked to name faculty role models). We compared frequency counts of clinically excellent faculty mentioned and frequency counts of role models mentioned by respondents. Spearman correlations and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the relationship between the responses.

RESULTS

A total of 39 of 66 faculty (59%) and 45 of 50 residents (90%) responded. There were 31 faculty members judged to be clinically excellent and 67 faculty identified as role models. Thirty faculty members appeared on both lists. There was a moderately high correlation between these groups (Spearman correlation coefficient  =  0.54, P < .001). Faculty members who were among those named as clinically excellent by their peers were more likely to be named 3 or more times as a role model by trainees (odds ratio, 24.6; confidence interval, 2.9-207).

CONCLUSIONS

This study tested and confirmed the correlation between clinical excellence and role modeling, illustrating the value of these faculty members at teaching hospitals.

摘要

背景

榜样示范是医学教育不可或缺的组成部分。文献表明,成为一名临床优秀的学术医师与作为实习生的榜样密切相关。

目的

探讨被认为临床优秀与被认为是有效榜样之间的关系。

方法

对临床在职教师(被要求列出临床优秀的同事)和内科住院医师(被要求列出教师榜样)进行了两项独立调查。我们比较了受访者提到的临床优秀教师的频次计数和榜样的频次计数。使用Spearman相关性和95%置信区间的优势比来评估回答之间的关系。

结果

66名教师中有39名(59%)和50名住院医师中有45名(90%)做出了回应。有31名教师被判定为临床优秀,67名教师被确定为榜样。30名教师出现在两个名单上。这些群体之间存在中度高度相关性(Spearman相关系数=0.54,P<.001)。被同行评为临床优秀的教师更有可能被实习生3次或更多次列为榜样(优势比为24.6;置信区间为2.9-207)。

结论

本研究检验并证实了临床优秀与榜样示范之间的相关性,说明了这些教师在教学医院的价值。

相似文献

2
Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models.优秀主治医生榜样的特质。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 31;339(27):1986-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812313392706.
10
My thoughts on teaching.我对教学的思考。
J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Fall;36(3):256-9. doi: 10.3138/jvme.36.3.256.

本文引用的文献

7
The decline of academic medicine.学术医学的衰落。
Lancet. 2006 Jul 22;368(9532):284. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69068-5.
8
Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved quality.意外死亡、挽救生命与质量提升。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 29;353(13):1405-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb051157.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验