Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Perspect Med Educ. 2012 Nov;1(4):162-171. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0024-1. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
Clinical reasoning is a core competence of doctors. Therefore, the assessment of clinical reasoning of undergraduate students is an important part of medical education. Three medical universities in the Netherlands wish to develop a shared question database in order to assess clinical reasoning of undergraduate students in Computer-Based Assessments (CBA). To determine suitable question types for this purpose a literature study was carried out. Search of ERIC and PubMed and subsequent cross referencing yielded 30 articles which met the inclusion criteria of a focus on question types suitable to assess clinical reasoning of medical students and providing recommendations for their use. Script Concordance Tests, Extended Matching Questions, Comprehensive Integrative Puzzles, Modified Essay Questions/Short Answer Questions, Long Menu Questions, Multiple Choice Questions, Multiple True/False Questions and Virtual Patients meet the above-mentioned criteria, but for different reasons not all types can be used easily in CBA. A combination of Comprehensive Integrative Puzzles and Extended Matching Questions seems to assess most aspects of clinical reasoning and these question types can be adapted for use in CBA. Regardless of the question type chosen, patient vignettes should be used as a standard stimulus format to assess clinical reasoning. Further research is necessary to ensure that the combination of these question types produces valid assessments and reliable test results.
临床推理是医生的核心能力。因此,评估本科生的临床推理能力是医学教育的重要组成部分。荷兰的三所医科大学希望开发一个共享的问题数据库,以便在基于计算机的评估(CBA)中评估本科生的临床推理能力。为了确定适合这一目的的问题类型,进行了文献研究。对 ERIC 和 PubMed 的搜索以及随后的交叉引用产生了 30 篇符合纳入标准的文章,这些文章的重点是适合评估医学生临床推理能力的问题类型,并为其使用提供了建议。脚本一致性测试、扩展匹配问题、综合综合拼图、修改后的短文问题/简答题、长菜单问题、多项选择题、多项真/假问题和虚拟患者符合上述标准,但由于各种原因,并非所有类型都可以在 CBA 中轻松使用。综合综合拼图和扩展匹配问题的组合似乎可以评估临床推理的大多数方面,这些问题类型可以适应 CBA 的使用。无论选择哪种问题类型,都应使用患者小插曲作为评估临床推理的标准刺激格式。需要进一步研究以确保这些问题类型的组合产生有效的评估和可靠的测试结果。