• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伽玛刀治疗经典三叉神经痛 497 例,至少随访 1 年,无痛缓解模式。

Patterns of pain-free response in 497 cases of classic trigeminal neuralgia treated with Gamma Knife surgery and followed up for least 1 year.

机构信息

Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Timone, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM, UMR 1106, Marseille, France.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117 Suppl:181-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.GKS121015.

DOI:10.3171/2012.8.GKS121015
PMID:23205808
Abstract

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to establish whether clear patterns of initial pain freedom could be identified when treating patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia (TN) by using Gamma Knife surgery (GKS). The authors compared hypesthesia and pain recurrence rates to see if statistically significant differences could be found.

METHODS

Between July 1992 and November 2010, 737 patients presenting with TN underwent GKS and prospective evaluation at Timone University Hospital in Marseille, France. In this study the authors analyzed the cases of 497 of these patients, who participated in follow-up longer than 1 year, did not have megadolichobasilar artery- or multiple sclerosis-related TN, and underwent GKS only once; in other words, the focus was on cases of classic TN with a single radiosurgical treatment. Radiosurgery was performed with a Leksell Gamma Knife (model B, C, or Perfexion) using both MR and CT imaging targeting. A single 4-mm isocenter was positioned in the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve at a median distance of 7.8 mm (range 4.5-14 mm) anterior to the emergence of the nerve. A median maximum dose of 85 Gy (range 70-90 Gy) was delivered. Using empirical methods and assisted by a chart with clear cut-off periods of pain free distribution, the authors were able to divide patients who experienced freedom from pain into 3 separate groups: patients who became pain free within the first 48 hours post-GKS; those who became pain free between 48 hours and 30 days post-GKS; and those who became pain free more than 30 days after GKS.

RESULTS

The median age in the 497 patients was 68.3 years (range 28.1-93.2 years). The median follow-up period was 43.75 months (range 12-174.41 months). Four hundred fifty-four patients (91.34%) were initially pain free within a median time of 10 days (range 1-459 days) after GKS. One hundred sixty-nine patients (37.2%) became pain free within the first 48 hours (Group PF(≤ 48 hours)), 194 patients (42.8%) between posttreatment Day 3 and Day 30 (Group PF((>48 hours, ≤ 30 days))), and 91 patients (20%) after 30 days post-GKS (Group PF(>30 days)). Differences in postoperative hypesthesia were found: in Group PF(≤ 48 hours) 18 patients (13.7%) developed postoperative hypesthesia, compared with 30 patients (19%) in Group PF((>48 hours, ≤ 30 days)) and 22 patients (30.6%) in Group PF(>30 days) (p = 0.014). One hundred fifty-seven patients (34.4%) who initially became free from pain experienced a recurrence of pain with a median delay of 24 months (range 0.62-150.06 months). There were no statistically significant differences between the patient groups with respect to pain recurrence: 66 patients (39%) in Group PF(≤ 48 hours) experienced pain recurrence, compared with 71 patients (36.6%) in Group PF((>48 hours, ≤ 30 days)) and 27 patients (29.7%) in Group PF(>30 days) (p = 0.515).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of patients (169 cases, 37.2%) became pain free within the first 48 hours. The rate of hypesthesia was higher in patients who became pain free more than 30 days after GKS, with a statistically significant difference between patient groups (p = 0.014).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定采用伽玛刀手术(GKS)治疗典型三叉神经痛(TN)患者时,是否可以明确初始疼痛缓解的模式。作者比较了感觉迟钝和疼痛复发率,以观察是否存在统计学上的显著差异。

方法

1992 年 7 月至 2010 年 11 月期间,737 例 TN 患者在马赛提蒙大学医院接受了 GKS 和前瞻性评估。在本研究中,作者分析了其中 497 例患者的病例,这些患者的随访时间超过 1 年,没有巨长基底动脉或多发性硬化症相关的 TN,并且只接受过一次 GKS;换句话说,重点是经典 TN 患者,单次放射外科治疗。放射外科治疗使用 Leksell Gamma Knife(型号 B、C 或 Perfexion),使用磁共振和 CT 成像靶向。在三叉神经神经鞘的脑池段以 7.8mm(范围 4.5-14mm)的中位数距离从前神经出孔前放置一个 4mm 的等中心点。中位最大剂量为 85Gy(范围 70-90Gy)。作者使用经验方法并借助具有明确疼痛无分布截止期的图表,将经历疼痛缓解的患者分为 3 个独立的组:GKS 后 48 小时内疼痛缓解的患者;GKS 后 48 小时至 30 天疼痛缓解的患者;以及 GKS 后 30 天以上疼痛缓解的患者。

结果

497 例患者的中位年龄为 68.3 岁(范围 28.1-93.2 岁)。中位随访期为 43.75 个月(范围 12-174.41 个月)。454 例患者(91.34%)在 GKS 后中位时间 10 天(范围 1-459 天)内最初疼痛缓解。169 例患者(37.2%)在 GKS 后 48 小时内(PF(≤48 小时)组)疼痛缓解,194 例患者(42.8%)在 GKS 后第 3 天至第 30 天(PF(>48 小时,≤30 天)组)疼痛缓解,91 例患者(20%)在 GKS 后 30 天(PF(>30 天)组)疼痛缓解。术后感觉迟钝存在差异:PF(≤48 小时)组 18 例患者(13.7%)出现术后感觉迟钝,PF(>48 小时,≤30 天)组 30 例患者(19%)和 PF(>30 天)组 22 例患者(30.6%)(p=0.014)。157 例最初疼痛缓解的患者(34.4%)在中位延迟 24 个月(范围 0.62-150.06 个月)后出现疼痛复发。各组患者在疼痛复发方面无统计学差异:PF(≤48 小时)组 66 例患者(39%)疼痛复发,PF(>48 小时,≤30 天)组 71 例患者(36.6%)和 PF(>30 天)组 27 例患者(29.7%)(p=0.515)。

结论

相当一部分患者(169 例,37.2%)在 GKS 后 48 小时内疼痛缓解。GKS 后 30 天以上疼痛缓解的患者感觉迟钝发生率较高,组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.014)。

相似文献

1
Patterns of pain-free response in 497 cases of classic trigeminal neuralgia treated with Gamma Knife surgery and followed up for least 1 year.伽玛刀治疗经典三叉神经痛 497 例,至少随访 1 年,无痛缓解模式。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117 Suppl:181-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.GKS121015.
2
Long-term safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a 497-patient historical cohort study.伽玛刀手术治疗经典型三叉神经痛的长期安全性和有效性:一项纳入497例患者的历史性队列研究
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):1079-87. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142144. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review.复发性三叉神经痛的伽玛刀重复手术:长期疗效及系统评价
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121 Suppl:210-21. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.GKS141487.
4
Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: outcomes and prognostic factors.伽玛刀治疗三叉神经痛:疗效与预后因素
J Neurosurg. 2005 Mar;102(3):434-41. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.3.0434.
5
Multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective series of 43 patients treated with gamma knife surgery with more than one year of follow-up.多发性硬化相关三叉神经痛:43例接受伽玛刀手术治疗且随访超过一年的前瞻性系列病例。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2014;92(4):203-10. doi: 10.1159/000362173. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
6
Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent or residual trigeminal neuralgia after a failed initial procedure.伽玛刀手术治疗初次手术失败后复发或残留的三叉神经痛。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;113 Suppl:172-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.GKS10915.
7
Quality-of-life outcomes after Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia.伽玛刀治疗三叉神经痛后的生活质量结果。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;113 Suppl:191-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.8.GKS10879.
8
Comparative study of Gamma Knife surgery and percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis.伽玛刀手术与经皮后根甘油rhizotomy 治疗多发性硬化三叉神经痛的对比研究。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117 Suppl:175-80. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.GKS12987.
9
Outcomes of Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia secondary to vertebrobasilar ectasia.伽玛刀手术治疗椎基底动脉扩张继发三叉神经痛的疗效。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;116(1):73-81. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.JNS11920. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
10
Long-term outcome of high-dose γ knife surgery in treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.高剂量γ刀手术治疗三叉神经痛的长期疗效。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1166-75. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.JNS12875. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia Using Autologous Muscle Grafting: A Retrospective Analysis in a Resource-Limited Setting.自体肌肉移植微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛:资源有限环境下的回顾性分析
Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81362. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81362. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia provides greater pain relief at higher dose rates.伽玛刀放射外科治疗三叉神经痛在更高剂量率下能提供更好的疼痛缓解效果。
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2022;8(2):117-125.
3
Efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in the management of multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
伽玛刀放射外科治疗多发性硬化相关三叉神经痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Dec;44(6):3069-3077. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01507-3. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
4
Factors affecting outcome in frameless non-isocentric stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a multicentric cohort study.影响无框架非等中心立体定向放射外科治疗三叉神经痛结局的因素:一项多中心队列研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 22;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01535-1.
5
Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.三叉神经痛的治疗结果——对领域、维度和测量方法的系统评价
World Neurosurg X. 2020 Jan 27;6:100070. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2020.100070. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia.三叉神经痛的射波刀放射外科治疗
Cureus. 2019 Oct 28;11(10):e6014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6014.
7
Immediate Pain Relief Elicited After Radiosurgery for Classical and Symptomatic Trigeminal Neuralgia.立体定向放射外科治疗典型性和症状性三叉神经痛后立即出现的疼痛缓解
Cureus. 2019 May 30;11(5):e4777. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4777.
8
Evaluation of CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia.射波刀放射外科治疗复发性三叉神经痛的评估
Cureus. 2018 May 9;10(5):e2598. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2598.
9
Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannoma: a 20-year experience with long-term treatment outcome.伽玛刀放射外科治疗三叉神经鞘瘤:20 年的长期治疗结果。
J Neurooncol. 2018 Oct;140(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2934-1. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
10
Predictors of trigeminal nerve dysfunction following stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia.三叉神经痛立体定向放射治疗后三叉神经功能障碍的预测因素
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2016;4(2):117-123.