Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 111, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Evolution. 2012 Dec;66(12):3852-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01734.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
Extreme selective environments are commonly believed to funnel evolution toward a few predictable outcomes. Caves are well-known extreme environments with characteristically adapted faunas that are similar in appearance, physiology, and behavior all over the world, even if not closely related. Morphological diversity between closely related cave species has been explained by difference in time since colonization and different ecological influence from the surface. Here, we tested a more classical hypothesis: morphological diversity is niche-based, and different morphologies reflect properties of microhabitats within caves. We analyzed seven communities with altogether 30 species of the subterranean amphipod (crustacean) genus Niphargus using multivariate morphometrics, multinomial logit models cross-validation, and phylogenetic reconstruction. Species clustered into four distinct ecomorph classes-small pore, cave stream, cave lake, and lake giants-associated with specific cave microhabitats and of multiple independent phylogenetic origins. Traits commonly regarded as adaptations to caves, such as antenna length, were shown to be related to microhabitat parameters, such as flow velocity. These results demonstrate that under the selection pressure of extreme environment, the ecomorphological structure of communities can converge. Thus, morphological diversity does not result from adaptive response to temporal and ecological gradients, but from fine-level niche partitioning.
极端选择环境通常被认为会使进化朝着少数可预测的结果发展。洞穴是众所周知的极端环境,具有特征性的适应动物群,这些动物群在全世界的外貌、生理和行为上都很相似,即使它们没有密切相关。对密切相关的洞穴物种之间的形态多样性的解释是由于殖民化时间的不同和与地表不同的生态影响。在这里,我们测试了一个更经典的假设:形态多样性是基于生态位的,不同的形态反映了洞穴内微生境的特性。我们使用多元形态测量学、多项逻辑回归模型交叉验证和系统发育重建分析了七个共有 30 种地下片脚类(甲壳纲)属 Niphargus 的群落。物种分为四个不同的生态形态类-小孔、洞穴溪流、洞穴湖泊和湖泊巨人-与特定的洞穴微生境和多个独立的系统发育起源有关。通常被认为是适应洞穴的特征,如触角长度,与流速等微生境参数有关。这些结果表明,在极端环境的选择压力下,群落的生态形态结构可以趋同。因此,形态多样性不是适应时间和生态梯度的结果,而是精细的生态位分化的结果。