• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disparities in use of gynecologic oncologists for women with ovarian cancer in the United States.美国卵巢癌患者接受妇科肿瘤学家治疗的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1135-53. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
2
Disparities in treatment and survival among elderly ovarian cancer patients.老年卵巢癌患者治疗和生存的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Nov;151(2):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.041. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
3
Sociodemographic disparities in advanced ovarian cancer survival and adherence to treatment guidelines.晚期卵巢癌生存率及治疗指南依从性方面的社会人口学差异
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):833-842. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000643.
4
Racial disparities in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.种族差异对晚期上皮性卵巢癌治疗的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1025-1032. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a92011.
5
Geographic Disparities in Potential Accessibility to Gynecologic Oncologists in the United States From 2001 to 2020.2001年至2020年美国妇科肿瘤学家潜在可及性的地理差异
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 1;142(3):688-697. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005284. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Disparities in hospice care among older women dying with ovarian cancer.老年女性卵巢癌患者临终关怀的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.041. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival by Socioeconomic Status Despite Medicare and Medicaid Insurance.尽管有医疗保险和医疗补助保险,但社会经济地位对乳腺癌生存的差异。
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):706-754. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12355.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities over time in the treatment and mortality of women with gynecological malignancies.妇科恶性肿瘤患者治疗和死亡率的种族和民族差异随时间的变化。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Apr;149(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.006.
9
Disparities in cancer outcomes across age, sex, and race/ethnicity among patients with pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌患者在年龄、性别和种族/民族方面的癌症结局差异。
Cancer Med. 2018 Feb;7(2):525-535. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1277. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
How we use hospice: Hospice enrollment patterns and costs in elderly ovarian cancer patients.我们如何使用临终关怀:老年卵巢癌患者的临终关怀入院模式和费用。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;152(3):452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.041.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of Healthcare Affordability, Availability, and Accessibility with Quality Treatment Metrics in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.医疗保健负担能力、可及性和可及性与卵巢癌患者治疗质量指标的关联。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jul 1;31(7):1383-1393. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1227.
2
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in adherence to preventive health services for ovarian cancer survivors.种族和社会经济差异对卵巢癌幸存者预防保健服务的遵从性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Aug;13(4):512-522. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00771-z. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
Gynecologic oncologists involvement on ovarian cancer standard of care receipt and survival.妇科肿瘤学家参与卵巢癌护理标准的接受情况及生存情况。
World J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(2):187-196. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v5.i2.187. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
Values and worries of ovarian cancer patients.卵巢癌患者的价值观与担忧
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):433-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
2
Gynecologic oncologists and ovarian cancer treatment: avenues for improved survival.妇科肿瘤学家和卵巢癌治疗:提高生存率的途径。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Sep;20(9):1257-60. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3053. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
3
Regional variation in cancer-directed surgery and mortality among women with epithelial ovarian cancer in the Medicare population.医疗保险人群中上皮性卵巢癌女性的癌症定向手术和死亡率的区域差异。
Cancer. 2010 Oct 15;116(20):4840-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25242.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in the use of surgery for ovarian cancer in the United States.美国卵巢癌手术治疗中种族/民族差异的研究
Adv Med Sci. 2010;55(1):93-8. doi: 10.2478/v10039-010-0021-8.
5
Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in US adults.美国成年人非贲门胃癌发病率的年龄特异性趋势。
JAMA. 2010 May 5;303(17):1723-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.496.
6
Impact of tumor grade on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: should we include grade in AJCC staging?肿瘤分级对胰腺癌预后的影响:我们是否应该将分级纳入 AJCC 分期?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;17(9):2312-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1071-7. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
7
Racial differences in cancer specialist consultation, treatment, and outcomes for locoregional pancreatic adenocarcinoma.局部进展期胰腺腺癌患者的癌症专家咨询、治疗和结局的种族差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov;16(11):2968-77. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0656-5. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
8
It's a choice to move forward: women's perceptions about treatment decision making in recurrent ovarian cancer.向前迈进是一种选择:女性对复发性卵巢癌治疗决策的看法。
Psychooncology. 2010 Mar;19(3):318-25. doi: 10.1002/pon.1562.
9
Specialized and high-volume care leads to better outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment in the Netherlands.在荷兰,专业化的高容量护理可带来更好的卵巢癌治疗效果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Mar;112(3):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
10
Race disparities between black and white women in the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of endometrial cancer.黑人女性与白人女性在子宫内膜癌的发病率、治疗及预后方面的种族差异。
Cancer Control. 2009 Jan;16(1):53-6. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600108.

美国卵巢癌患者接受妇科肿瘤学家治疗的差异。

Disparities in use of gynecologic oncologists for women with ovarian cancer in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1135-53. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12012
PMID:23206237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3681247/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine disparities in utilization of gynecologic oncologists (GOs) across race and other sociodemographic factors for women with ovarian cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Obtained SEER-Medicare linked dataset for 4,233 non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic African American, Hispanic of any race, and Non-Hispanic Asian women aged ≥ 66 years old diagnosed with ovarian cancer during 2000-2002 from 17 SEER registries. Physician specialty was identified by linking data to the AMA master file using Unique Physician Identification Numbers.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective claims data analysis for 1999-2006. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between GO utilization and race/ethnicity in the initial, continuing, and final phases of care.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

GO use decreased from the initial to final phase of care (51.4-28.8 percent). No racial/ethnic differences were found overall and by phase of cancer care. Women >70 years old and those with unstaged disease were less likely to receive GO care compared to their counterparts. GO use was lower in some SEER registries compared to the Atlanta registry.

CONCLUSIONS

GO use for the initial ovarian cancer treatment or for longer term care was low but not different across racial/ethnic groups. Future research should identify factors that affect GO utilization and understand why use of these specialists remains low.

摘要

目的

考察卵巢癌患者在种族和其他社会人口因素方面利用妇科肿瘤学家(GO)的差异。

资料来源

从 17 个 SEER 登记处获取了 2000-2002 年间诊断为卵巢癌的年龄≥66 岁的 4233 名非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔非裔美国人、任何种族的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔亚裔女性的 SEER-Medicare 关联数据集。通过使用唯一医师识别号码将数据与 AMA 主文件链接,确定医师专业。

研究设计

1999-2006 年回顾性索赔数据分析。使用逻辑回归模型分析在初始、持续和最终治疗阶段,GO 利用率与种族/族裔之间的关联。

主要发现

GO 的使用从初始治疗阶段下降到最终治疗阶段(51.4-28.8%)。总体上和按癌症治疗阶段均未发现种族/族裔差异。与同龄人相比,年龄>70 岁和未分期疾病的女性不太可能接受 GO 治疗。与亚特兰大登记处相比,一些 SEER 登记处的 GO 使用量较低。

结论

GO 用于初始卵巢癌治疗或长期治疗的使用率较低,但在不同种族/族裔群体中没有差异。未来的研究应确定影响 GO 利用率的因素,并了解为何这些专家的使用率仍然较低。