Nierenberg J, Ator N A
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Feb;35(2):405-12. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90177-j.
In Phase 1, rats were trained to discriminate either diazepam or pentobarbital from the no-drug condition. Diazepam, pentobarbital, triazolam, meprobamate, and zopiclone occasioned 100% drug-lever responding in tests under both training conditions; but the generalization gradients determined under the pentobarbital training condition were shifted to the right of those determined under the diazepam training condition. In Phase 2, the training drugs were reversed for the two groups, as well as which lever was paired with drug or no drug, in an effort to produce greater specificity of the Phase 2 discrimination. In Phase 2 tests, the Phase 1 training drug occasioned responding on the Phase 2 drug lever in all rats, suggesting that retraining overrode the Phase 1 discrimination. There were indications, however, that Phase 1 training influenced Phase 2 responding: 1) Rats ceased responding partway through no-drug training sessions using the former drug lever, and criterion performance was somewhat more difficult to maintain in Phase 2. 2) In Phase 2, dose-effect curves determined under pentobarbital training were shifted even further to the right of those determined under diazepam training than in Phase 1.
在第一阶段,训练大鼠在无药物状态下区分地西泮或戊巴比妥。地西泮、戊巴比妥、三唑仑、甲丙氨酯和佐匹克隆在两种训练条件下的测试中均引发了100%的药物杠杆反应;但在戊巴比妥训练条件下确定的泛化梯度向右偏移至地西泮训练条件下确定的泛化梯度的右侧。在第二阶段,两组的训练药物以及与药物或无药物配对的杠杆被对调,以努力使第二阶段的区分更具特异性。在第二阶段的测试中,第一阶段的训练药物在所有大鼠中均引发了对第二阶段药物杠杆的反应,这表明重新训练推翻了第一阶段的区分。然而,有迹象表明第一阶段的训练影响了第二阶段的反应:1)大鼠在使用先前的药物杠杆进行无药物训练期间中途停止反应,且在第二阶段维持标准表现 somewhat more difficult(此处原文有误,结合上下文推测可能是“more difficult”,即“更困难”)。2)在第二阶段,戊巴比妥训练条件下确定的剂量 - 效应曲线比第一阶段更向右偏移至地西泮训练条件下确定的剂量 - 效应曲线的右侧。