University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.042. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
Outcomes for patients in the second-line setting of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are dismal. The recognized prognostic factors in this context are Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) >0, hemoglobin level (Hb) <10 g/dl, and liver metastasis (LM).
The purpose of this retrospective study of prospective trials was to investigate the prognostic value of time from prior chemotherapy (TFPC) independent of known prognostic factors.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from patients from seven prospective trials with available baseline TFPC, Hb, PS, and LM values were used for retrospective analysis (n=570). External validation was conducted in a second-line phase 3 trial comparing best supportive care (BSC) versus vinflunine plus BSC (n=352).
Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of factors, with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) being the respective primary and secondary outcome measures.
ECOG-PS >0, LM, Hb <10 g/dl, and shorter TFPC were significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS on multivariable analysis. Patients with zero, one, two, and three to four factors demonstrated median OS of 12.2, 6.7, 5.1, and 3.0 mo, respectively (concordance statistic=0.638). Setting of prior chemotherapy (metastatic disease vs perioperative) and prior platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) were not prognostic factors. External validation demonstrated a significant association of TFPC with PFS on univariable and most multivariable analyses, and with OS on univariable analyses. Limitations of retrospective analyses are applicable.
Shorter TFPC enhances prognostic classification independent of ECOG-PS >0, Hb <10 g/dl, and LM in the setting of second-line therapy for advanced UC. These data may facilitate drug development and interpretation of trials.
晚期尿路上皮癌(UC)二线治疗患者的预后较差。在这种情况下,公认的预后因素包括东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)表现状态(PS)>0、血红蛋白(Hb)<10g/dl 和肝转移(LM)。
本回顾性研究对前瞻性试验进行了分析,旨在研究化疗前时间(TFPC)作为独立于已知预后因素的预后指标的价值。
设计、地点和参与者:使用来自 7 项前瞻性试验的数据进行回顾性分析,这些试验具有基线 TFPC、Hb、PS 和 LM 值(n=570)。外部验证是在二线 3 期试验中进行的,比较了最佳支持治疗(BSC)与vinflunine+BSC(n=352)。
使用 Cox 比例风险回归评估因素与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性,分别为主要和次要终点。
多变量分析显示,ECOG-PS>0、LM、Hb<10g/dl 和较短的 TFPC 是 OS 和 PFS 的显著预后因素。具有零、一、二和三至四个因素的患者中位 OS 分别为 12.2、6.7、5.1 和 3.0 个月(一致性统计量=0.638)。既往化疗的治疗部位(转移性疾病与围手术期)和既往铂类药物(顺铂或卡铂)不是预后因素。外部验证表明,TFPC 与 PFS 的单变量和大多数多变量分析以及 OS 的单变量分析均有显著相关性。回顾性分析的局限性仍然适用。
在晚期 UC 的二线治疗中,与 ECOG-PS>0、Hb<10g/dl 和 LM 相比,较短的 TFPC 可增强预后分类。这些数据可能有助于药物开发和临床试验的解释。