Locke Jennifer A, Pond Gregory Russell, Sonpavde Guru, Necchi Andrea, Giannatempo Patrizia, Paluri Ravi Kumar, Niegisch Guenter, Albers Peter, Buonerba Carlo, Di Lorenzo Giuseppe, Vaishampayan Ulka N, North Scott A, Agarwal Neeraj, Hussain Syed A, Pal Sumanta, Eigl Bernhard J
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
The optimal choice of first-line chemotherapy for patients with relapse of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PCBC) is unclear. We investigated the outcomes with cisplatin rechallenge versus a non-cisplatin regimen in patients with recurrent metastatic UC after PCBC in a multicenter retrospective study.
Individual patient-level data were collected for patients who had received various first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced UC after previous PCBC. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the prognostic ability of the type of perioperative and first-line chemotherapy to independently affect overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after accounting for known prognostic factors.
Data were available for 145 patients (12 centers). The mean age was 62 years; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was > 0 for 42.0% of the patients. Of the 145 patients, 63% had received cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. The median time from previous chemotherapy (TFPC) was 6.2 months (range, 1-154 months). The median OS was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-27 months), and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5-7 months). A better ECOG PS and a longer TFPC (> 12 months vs. ≤ 12 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52; P < .001) was prognostic for OS and PFS. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.13-3.06; P = .015), which appeared to be pronounced in those patients with a TFPC of ≤ 12 months. Retreatment with cisplatin in the first-line setting was associated with worse OS (HR, 3.38; P < .001).
The results of the present retrospective analysis suggest that for patients who have undergone previous PCBC for UC, rechallenging with cisplatin might confer a poorer OS, especially for those with progression within < 1 year.
围手术期基于顺铂的化疗(PCBC)后尿路上皮癌(UC)复发患者的一线化疗最佳选择尚不清楚。在一项多中心回顾性研究中,我们调查了PCBC后复发性转移性UC患者顺铂再挑战与非顺铂方案的治疗结果。
收集了接受过PCBC后晚期UC的各种一线化疗方案的患者的个体患者水平数据。使用Cox比例风险模型,在考虑已知预后因素后,研究围手术期和一线化疗类型对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的独立影响的预后能力。
145例患者(12个中心)的数据可用。平均年龄为62岁;42.0%的患者东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态(PS)>0。在145例患者中,63%接受了基于顺铂的一线化疗。距上次化疗(TFPC)的中位时间为6.2个月(范围1-154个月)。中位OS为22个月(95%置信区间[CI],18-27个月),中位PFS为6个月(95%CI,5-7个月)。更好的ECOG PS和更长的TFPC(>12个月对≤12个月;风险比[HR],0.32;95%CI,0.20-0.52;P<.001)对OS和PFS具有预后意义。基于顺铂的化疗与较差的OS相关(HR,1.86;95%CI,1.13-3.06;P=0.015),这在TFPC≤12个月的患者中似乎更为明显。一线使用顺铂再治疗与较差的OS相关(HR,3.38;P<.001)。
本回顾性分析结果表明,对于既往接受过UC的PCBC治疗的患者,顺铂再挑战可能导致较差的OS,尤其是对于那些在<1年内进展的患者。