Suppr超能文献

颅内动脉瘤线圈栓塞术患者首次线圈放置失败的频率及相关因素。

Frequency and factors associated with unsuccessful lead (first) coil placement in patients undergoing coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72(3):452-8; discussion 458. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182804ad1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited knowledge about associated rates, aneurysm characteristics, technical factors, and immediate impact of unsuccessful placement of the lead (first) coil during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates, associated risk factors, and consequences of lead coil placement failure in consecutive embolization procedures.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical and procedural aspects of all endovascular coil embolizations performed at our 2 academic centers over a period of 3.5 years (2006-2010). Morphologic characteristics of the aneurysm and technical aspects of the treatment were recorded. We also performed a flow model analysis to assess the relationship between aneurysm dimensions, length of coil, packing density with first coil, and occurrence of lead coil placement failure.

RESULTS

There were 24 (14%) lead coil placement failure procedures in 172 aneurysm embolization procedures; in 23 of 24 (96%) patients with lead coil placement failure, the failure occurred in aneurysms less than 10 mm in size. The main technical factors associated with lead coil placement failure were related to the coil (length, diameter, and type) followed by microcatheter support failure. Among these patients, 21 (87.5%) required change in the coil length, 17 (70.8%) change in coil diameter, and 10 (41.7%) change in coil type (brand and/or configuration) for successful placement of the lead coil. A total of 4 (16.7%) patients required change in microcatheter, and 6 (24.9%) patients had balloon/stent assistance for successful lead coil placement. Two of 24 (8.3%) patients had rupture of their aneurysms during the attempt to reposition the lead coil. In our flow model, these clinical observations were reproduced with higher risk of lead coil failure in smaller aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

Lead coil placement failure is not infrequent during embolization of intracranial aneurysms and may increase the risk of complications. Appropriate coil selection, particularly coil length in small aneurysms, may reduce the rate of lead coil placement failure and associated complications.

摘要

背景

在颅内动脉瘤血管内栓塞治疗中,关于首次放置导丝圈(lead coil)失败的相关发生率、动脉瘤特征、技术因素和即时影响,我们的了解十分有限。

目的

旨在明确连续栓塞治疗过程中导丝圈放置失败的发生率、相关危险因素和后果。

方法

我们回顾了 3.5 年间(2006 年-2010 年)在我们的 2 个学术中心进行的所有血管内线圈栓塞治疗的临床和程序方面。记录了动脉瘤的形态特征和治疗的技术方面。我们还进行了流型分析,以评估动脉瘤尺寸、线圈长度、包装密度与首次线圈、以及导丝圈放置失败的发生之间的关系。

结果

在 172 例动脉瘤栓塞治疗中,有 24 例(14%)发生导丝圈放置失败;在 24 例发生导丝圈放置失败的患者中,有 23 例(96%)的失败发生在小于 10mm 的动脉瘤中。与导丝圈放置失败相关的主要技术因素与线圈(长度、直径和类型)有关,其次是微导管支持失败。在这些患者中,21 例(87.5%)需要改变线圈长度,17 例(70.8%)需要改变线圈直径,10 例(41.7%)需要改变线圈类型(品牌和/或构型)以成功放置导丝圈。总共 4 例(16.7%)患者需要改变微导管,6 例(24.9%)患者需要球囊/支架辅助以成功放置导丝圈。24 例中有 2 例(8.3%)患者在试图重新定位导丝圈时发生了动脉瘤破裂。在我们的流型模型中,这些临床观察结果在较小的动脉瘤中表现出更高的导丝圈失败风险。

结论

在颅内动脉瘤栓塞治疗中,导丝圈放置失败并不罕见,可能会增加并发症的风险。适当的线圈选择,特别是在小动脉瘤中选择合适的线圈长度,可能会降低导丝圈放置失败的发生率和相关并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验