Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌患者接受西妥昔单抗治疗后的感染并发症:倾向评分和工具变量分析。

Infectious complications in head and neck cancer patients treated with cetuximab: propensity score and instrumental variable analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050163. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the infection rates between cetuximab-treated patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) and untreated patients.

METHODOLOGY

A national cohort of 1083 HNC patients identified in 2010 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database was established. After patients were followed for one year, propensity score analysis and instrumental variable analysis were performed to assess the association between cetuximab therapy and the infection rates.

RESULTS

HNC patients receiving cetuximab (n = 158) were older, had lower SES, and resided more frequently in rural areas as compared to those without cetuximab therapy. 125 patients, 32 (20.3%) in the group using cetuximab and 93 (10.1%) in the group not using it presented infections. The propensity score analysis revealed a 2.3-fold (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.46-3.54; P = 0.001) increased risk for infection in HNC patients treated with cetuximab. However, using IVA, the average treatment effect of cetuximab was not statistically associated with increased risk of infection (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Cetuximab therapy was not statistically associated with infection rate in HNC patients. However, older HNC patients using cetuximab may incur up to 33% infection rate during one year. Particular attention should be given to older HNC patients treated with cetuximab.

摘要

背景

比较头颈部癌症(HNC)接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者和未接受治疗的患者的感染率。

方法

从台湾全民健康保险研究数据库中确定了 2010 年 1083 例 HNC 患者的全国队列。对患者进行一年的随访后,进行倾向评分分析和工具变量分析,以评估西妥昔单抗治疗与感染率之间的关系。

结果

与未接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者相比,接受西妥昔单抗治疗的 HNC 患者(n=158)年龄更大,社会经济地位较低,居住在农村地区的频率更高。125 例患者中,32 例(20.3%)在使用西妥昔单抗的组中,93 例(10.1%)在未使用西妥昔单抗的组中出现感染。倾向评分分析显示,使用西妥昔单抗治疗的 HNC 患者感染的风险增加了 2.3 倍(调整后的优势比[OR] = 2.27;95%置信区间,1.46-3.54;P = 0.001)。然而,使用IVA,西妥昔单抗的平均治疗效果与感染风险增加无关(OR,0.87;95%置信区间,0.61-1.14)。

结论

西妥昔单抗治疗与 HNC 患者的感染率无关。然而,使用西妥昔单抗的老年 HNC 患者在一年内可能会发生高达 33%的感染率。应特别关注接受西妥昔单抗治疗的老年 HNC 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e235/3509146/3d6a66fb44a9/pone.0050163.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验