Department of Chemistry and Biology, Science & Technology, Physical Chemistry I, University of Siegen, 57076 Siegen, Germany.
Langmuir. 2013 Jan 15;29(2):620-32. doi: 10.1021/la304193d. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
To date, TM AFM (tapping mode or intermittent contact mode atomic force microscopy) is the most frequently applied direct imaging technique to visualize surface nanobubbles at the solid-aqueous interface. On one hand, AFM is the only profilometric technique that provides estimates of the bubbles' nanoscopic dimensions. On the other hand, the nanoscopic contact angles of surface nanobubbles estimated from their apparent dimensions that are deduced from AFM "height" images of nanobubbles differ markedly from the macrocopic water contact angles on the identical substrates. Here we show in detail how the apparent bubble height and width of surface nanobubbles on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) depend on the free amplitude of the cantilever oscillations and the amplitude setpoint ratio. (The role of these two AFM imaging parameters and their interdependence has not been studied so far for nanobubbles in a systematic way.) In all experiments, even with optimal scanning parameters, nanobubbles at the HOPG-water interface appeared to be smaller in the AFM images than their true size, which was estimated using a method presented herein. It was also observed that the severity of the underestimate increased with increasing bubble height and radius of curvature. The nanoscopic contact angle of >130° for nanobubbles on HOPG extrapolated to zero interaction force was only slightly overestimated and hence significantly higher than the macroscopic contact angle of water on HOPG (63 ± 2°). Thus, the widely reported contact angle discrepancy cannot be solely attributed to inappropriate AFM imaging conditions.
迄今为止,TM AFM(敲击模式或间歇接触模式原子力显微镜)是最常用于可视化固-液界面表面纳米气泡的直接成像技术。一方面,AFM 是唯一提供气泡纳米级尺寸估计的形貌技术。另一方面,从 AFM“高度”图像推断出的表面纳米气泡的表观尺寸所估计的纳米接触角与相同基底上的宏观水接触角明显不同。在这里,我们详细展示了高度取向热解石墨(HOPG)上表面纳米气泡的表观气泡高度和宽度如何取决于悬臂振动的自由振幅和振幅设定点比。(到目前为止,还没有系统地研究这两个 AFM 成像参数及其相互依赖性对纳米气泡的作用。)在所有实验中,即使采用最佳扫描参数,HOPG-水界面上的纳米气泡在 AFM 图像中似乎也比其真实尺寸小,这是使用本文提出的方法估计的。还观察到,随着气泡高度和曲率半径的增加,低估的严重程度增加。在零相互作用力下,纳米气泡在 HOPG 上的>130°纳米接触角被略微高估,因此明显高于 HOPG 上水的宏观接触角(63±2°)。因此,广泛报道的接触角差异不能仅归因于不适当的 AFM 成像条件。