• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AMS 700™ CX 与科洛普夫™ Titan 可膨胀阴茎假体治疗 Peyronie 病和重塑的比较:临床结果和患者满意度。

Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

机构信息

Division of Urology, St Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2855-60. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12009. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1111/jsm.12009
PMID:23210973
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) with simultaneous manual penile remodeling allows for men to undergo a single procedure aimed at correcting both the penile deformity/curvature and erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in men with Peyronie's disease (PD) and ED who underwent AMS 700™ CX and the newer Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographics, type of IPP, clinical outcomes, post-implant sexual characteristics, and overall patient satisfaction.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of clinical database and prospective telephone survey were conducted in all men with PD who underwent IPP between January 2006 and November 2010.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients with an average age of 57.7 (32 to 80) underwent AMS 700 CX (88 patients) and Coloplast Titans (50 patients) IPP implantation during the 5-year period. The majority of patients (91%) had only one IPP implantation. The IPP clinical outcomes include eight (6%) revision surgery for device malfunction and three (2%) device explantation for prosthesis infection. While there was no statistically significance in device survival between the two devices, the trend favored AMS 700 CX over Titan (5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of mechanical survival were 91% vs. 87%, P>0.05) and both IPPs provided similar penile straightening without the need for revision surgery. Most men (79%) reported great satisfaction following CX or Titan implants with greater than two thirds of men reported greater self-confidence and 82% of patients would undergo the same operation again.

CONCLUSIONS

AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan IPP implantation and penile remodeling appeared to provide permanent penile straightening and high patient satisfaction without an increase risk of revision surgery.

摘要

简介

植入可充气阴茎假体 (IPP) 并同时进行手动阴茎重塑,可让男性接受单一手术,以矫正阴茎畸形/弯曲和勃起功能障碍 (ED)。

目的

评估同时患有 Peyronie 病 (PD) 和 ED 的男性接受 AMS 700™ CX 和较新型 Coloplast™ Titan 可充气阴茎假体 (IPP) 植入后的临床结果和患者满意度。

主要观察指标

患者人口统计学资料、IPP 类型、临床结果、植入后的性特征和总体患者满意度。

方法

对 2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 11 月期间在单一中心接受 IPP 治疗的所有 PD 男性患者进行了临床数据库的回顾性分析和前瞻性电话调查。

结果

在 5 年期间,共有 138 名平均年龄为 57.7(32 至 80)岁的男性患者接受了 AMS 700 CX(88 名患者)和 Coloplast Titans(50 名患者)IPP 植入。大多数患者(91%)仅接受了一次 IPP 植入。IPP 临床结果包括 8 例(6%)因器械故障进行的翻修手术和 3 例(2%)因假体感染进行的器械取出。虽然两种设备的器械存活率无统计学差异,但趋势倾向于 AMS 700 CX 优于 Titan(5 年 Kaplan-Meier 机械存活率估计值分别为 91%和 87%,P>0.05),并且两种 IPP 均提供了类似的阴茎伸直效果,无需进行翻修手术。大多数男性(79%)在接受 CX 或 Titan 植入后报告非常满意,超过三分之二的男性报告自我信心增强,82%的患者会再次接受相同的手术。

结论

AMS 700™ CX 和 Coloplast™ Titan IPP 植入和阴茎重塑似乎提供了永久性的阴茎伸直和高患者满意度,而不会增加翻修手术的风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.AMS 700™ CX 与科洛普夫™ Titan 可膨胀阴茎假体治疗 Peyronie 病和重塑的比较:临床结果和患者满意度。
J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2855-60. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12009. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
2
Impact of key pinch strength on patient preference for inflatable penile prosthesis: a prospective study comparing Coloplast™ and AMS™ models.关键捏力对患者对可充气阴茎假体偏好的影响:比较科洛普和 AMS 模型的前瞻性研究。
Int J Impot Res. 2020 Jan;32(1):113-116. doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0129-8. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
3
The PICS Technique: A Novel Approach for Residual Curvature Correction During Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Severe Peyronie's Disease Using the Collagen Fleece TachoSil.PICS 技术:使用胶原蛋白毡 TachoSil 在严重 Peyronie 病患者中植入阴茎假体时矫正残余弯曲的新方法。
J Sex Med. 2018 Mar;15(3):416-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.12.012. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Peyronie's Disease: Results of the PROPPER Study Demonstrates a Decrease in Patient-Reported Depression.阴茎假体植入治疗 Peyronie 病患者:PROPPER 研究结果显示患者报告的抑郁程度降低。
J Sex Med. 2018 May;15(5):786-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.阴茎假体植入术后的长期随访——生存和生活质量结果。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
6
Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie's disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: A single-center study.阴茎假体植入治疗合并药物抵抗性勃起功能障碍的 Peyronie 病患者:单中心研究。
J Sex Med. 2010 Nov;7(11):3775-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01971.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
7
High patient satisfaction of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion with synchronous penile plication for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease.勃起功能障碍和 Peyronie 病患者对充气阴茎假体植入联合阴茎折叠术的满意度高。
J Sex Med. 2014 Jun;11(6):1593-8. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12530. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Use of inflatable penile prostheses AMS CX with momentary squeeze in a patient with Peyronie's disease after removal of two previously implanted penile prostheses.在一名佩罗尼氏病患者移除两个先前植入的阴茎假体后,使用带瞬间挤压功能的AMS CX可膨胀阴茎假体。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Mar 28;86(1):46-7. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.1.46.
9
Re: comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.关于AMS 700™ CX与康乐保™ 泰坦可膨胀阴茎假体治疗佩罗尼氏病及重塑阴茎的比较:临床结果与患者满意度
J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1837. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.063. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
10
Subcoronal inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: indications and outcomes.冠状沟下可膨胀阴茎假体植入术:适应证与疗效。
J Sex Med. 2023 May 26;20(6):888-892. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad049.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal rate and mechanical failure in penile prosthesis implantation: A systematic review.阴茎假体植入的移除率和机械故障:一项系统评价。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01165-9.
2
Penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review of intraoperative and postoperative complications.阴茎假体植入术:术中及术后并发症的系统评价
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01108-4.
3
How to improve functional outcome of inflatable penile implant surgery? a narrative review.如何改善可膨胀阴茎假体手术的功能结果?一项叙述性综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01030-9.
4
MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.阴茎病变与假体的磁共振成像
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan;50(1):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04417-2. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
5
Penile prosthesis implantation: a bibliometric-based visualization study.阴茎假体植入术:一项基于文献计量学的可视化研究
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):4-13. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00927-1. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
6
Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease: a review of surgical considerations, approaches, and maneuvers.佩罗尼氏病中可膨胀阴茎假体植入:手术考量、入路及操作综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):139-155. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-180. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
7
Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review.阴茎假体的最新技术发展:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):165-184. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-741. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
8
Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature.目前阴茎植入手术中的设备、结果和疼痛管理注意事项:文献的最新综述。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Jul 1;26(4):335-343. doi: 10.4103/aja202386. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
9
Perspective: Residual penile curvature correction during penile prosthesis implantation by plication in Peyronie's patients.观点:在 Peyronie 病患者中,通过折叠术在阴茎假体植入术中矫正残余阴茎弯曲。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):643-646. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00774-6. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
10
Clinical recommendations on penile reconstructive and prosthetic surgery: a consensus statement from the Asia-Pacific Society of Sexual Medicine.阴茎重建与假体手术临床推荐:亚太性医学学会共识声明
Sex Med. 2023 Apr 11;11(2):qfad003. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad003. eCollection 2023 Apr.