Department of Agricultual and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):183-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
This report demonstrates how existing national data can be used to first calculate upper limits on the average cost per participant and per outcome per state/territory for the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP). These upper limits can then be used by state EFNEP administrators to obtain more precise estimates for their states, based on their state-specific knowledge. Across all states, EFNEP appears most cost effective in nutrition practices, followed by food resource management practices, and then food safety practices. All but 3 states have cost per quality adjusted life years that are considered cost effective.
本报告展示了如何利用现有国家数据，首先计算每个州/地区每位参与者和每个结果的扩展食品和营养教育计划（EFNEP）的平均成本上限。然后，州 EFNEP 管理员可以根据其特定州的知识，利用这些上限来获得更精确的估计。在所有州中，EFNEP 在营养实践中最具成本效益，其次是食品资源管理实践，然后是食品安全实践。除了 3 个州之外，所有州的每质量调整生命年成本都被认为是具有成本效益的。
