Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Cancer. 2013 Mar 15;119(6):1210-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27800. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Hospital volume for several major operations is associated with treatment outcomes. In this study, the authors explored the influence of hospital radiofrequency ablation (RFA) volume on the prognosis of patients who received RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
The authors searched for all patients who were diagnosed with stage I or stage II HCC from 2004 to 2006 and who received RFA as first-line therapy in a population-based cohort. Overall survival (OS) and liver cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared according to hospital volume. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.
In total, 661 patients received first-line RFA for stage I and II HCC in 28 hospitals. Among these, there were 480 patients (72.6%) in the high-volume group (those who received RFA at hospitals that treated >10 first-line patients per year), and there were 181 patients (27.4%) in the low-volume group (those who received RFA at hospitals that treated ≤ 10 first-line patients per year). The sex, age, stage, tumor size, and year of diagnosis for patients in the 2 groups did not differ significantly. Patients in the high-volume group demonstrated significantly longer OS and CSS than those in the low-volume group (5-year OS rate, 58.7% vs 47.2%; P = .001; 5-year CSS rate, 67.1% vs 57.1%; P = .009). After adjusting for covariates, high-volume hospitals remained an independent predictor of longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.57; P < .001) and CSS (hazard ratio, 0.57; P = .003).
Patients who received first-line RFA for HCC in high-volume hospitals demonstrated better survival outcomes.
多项主要手术的医院容量与治疗结果相关。在这项研究中,作者探讨了医院射频消融(RFA)量对接受 HCC 患者 RFA 一线治疗的患者预后的影响。
作者在基于人群的队列中搜索了所有 2004 年至 2006 年被诊断为 I 期或 II 期 HCC 并接受 RFA 作为一线治疗的患者。根据医院容量比较总生存率(OS)和肝癌特异性生存率(CSS)。使用 Cox 比例风险模型进行多变量分析。
共有 661 例患者在 28 家医院接受了 I 期和 II 期 HCC 的一线 RFA。其中,高容量组(每年接受 RFA 治疗> 10 例一线患者的医院)有 480 例(72.6%)患者,低容量组(每年接受 RFA 治疗的医院≤ 10 例一线患者)有 181 例(27.4%)。两组患者的性别、年龄、分期、肿瘤大小和诊断年份无显著差异。高容量组的患者 OS 和 CSS 明显长于低容量组(5 年 OS 率,58.7%比 47.2%;P =.001;5 年 CSS 率,67.1%比 57.1%;P =.009)。调整协变量后,大容量医院仍然是 OS 延长的独立预测因子(风险比,0.57;P <.001)和 CSS(风险比,0.57;P =.003)。
在大容量医院接受 HCC 一线 RFA 的患者的生存结果更好。