Daivis Peter J, Dalton Benjamin A, Morishita Tetsuya
School of Applied Sciences, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Nov;86(5 Pt 2):056707. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.056707. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
Thermostats for homogeneous nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations are usually designed to control the kinetic temperature, but it is now possible control any combination of many different types of temperature, including the configurational and kinetic temperatures and their directional components. It is well known that these temperatures can become unequal in homogeneously thermostatted shearing steady states. The microscopic expressions for these temperatures are all derived from equilibrium distribution functions, and it is pertinent to ask, what are the consequences of using these equilibrium microscopic expressions for temperature in thermostats for shearing nonequilibrium steady states? Here we show that the answer to this question depends on which properties are being investigated. We present numerical results showing that the value of the zero shear rate viscosity obtained by extrapolating results of nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of shearing steady states is the same, regardless of the type of temperature that is controlled. It also agrees with the value obtained from the equilibrium stress autocorrelation function via the Green-Kubo relation. However, the values of the limiting zero shear rate first normal stress coefficient obtained from nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of shearing steady states are strongly dependent on the choice of temperature being controlled. They also differ from the value of the first normal stress coefficient that is calculated from the equilibrium stress autocorrelation function. We show that even when all of the directional components of the kinetic and configurational temperatures are simultaneously controlled to the same value, the agreement with the result obtained from the equilibrium stress autocorrelation function is poor.
用于均匀非平衡分子动力学模拟的恒温器通常设计用于控制动力学温度,但现在可以控制许多不同类型温度的任何组合,包括构型温度和动力学温度及其方向分量。众所周知,在均匀恒温剪切稳态中,这些温度可能会变得不相等。这些温度的微观表达式均源自平衡分布函数,因此有必要问,在剪切非平衡稳态的恒温器中使用这些平衡微观温度表达式会有什么后果?在这里,我们表明这个问题的答案取决于所研究的性质。我们给出的数值结果表明,通过外推剪切稳态的非平衡分子动力学模拟结果得到的零剪切速率粘度值是相同的,无论控制的是哪种温度类型。它也与通过格林 - 库博关系从平衡应力自相关函数得到的值一致。然而,从剪切稳态的非平衡分子动力学模拟中获得的极限零剪切速率第一法向应力系数的值强烈依赖于所控制温度的选择。它们也与从平衡应力自相关函数计算得到的第一法向应力系数的值不同。我们表明,即使将动力学温度和构型温度的所有方向分量同时控制到相同的值,与从平衡应力自相关函数得到的结果的一致性也很差。