Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, CH 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
J Phys Chem A. 2013 Jan 10;117(1):228-43. doi: 10.1021/jp310735h. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
The recently proposed ATOMIC protocol is a fully ab initio thermochemical protocol that rests upon the concept of bond separation reactions (BSRs) to correct for systematic errors of composite wave function approaches. It achieves high accuracy for atomization energies and derived heats of formation if basis set requirements for all contributing components are balanced carefully. The present work explores the potential of density functionals as possible replacements of composite wave function approaches in the ATOMIC protocol. Twenty density functionals are examined for their accuracy in thermochemical predictions based on calculated bond-separation energies and precomputed high-level data for the small parent molecules entering BSRs. The best density functionals outperform CCSD (coupled cluster with singles and doubles excitations), but none reaches the accuracy of well-balanced composite wave function approaches that consider quasiperturbational connected triples excitations at least with small basis sets. Some functionals show unexpected problems with bond separation reactions and are analyzed further with a model of empirically calibrated bond additivity corrections. Finally, the benefit of adding empirical dispersion terms to common density functionals is analyzed in the context of BSR-corrected thermochemistry.
最近提出的 ATOMIC 协议是一种完全从头算的热化学协议,它基于键分离反应(BSR)的概念来纠正复合波函数方法的系统误差。如果仔细平衡所有贡献成分的基组要求,则可以实现原子化能和衍生生成热的高精度。本工作探讨了密度泛函作为 ATOMIC 协议中复合波函数方法的可能替代品的潜力。基于计算的键分离能和进入 BSR 的小母体分子的预先计算的高精度数据,检查了 20 种密度泛函在热化学预测中的准确性。最好的密度泛函表现优于 CCSD(单双激发耦合簇),但没有一种达到考虑准微扰连接三重激发的平衡良好的复合波函数方法的准确性,至少在小基组下是如此。一些函数在键分离反应中出现了意想不到的问题,并使用经验校准键加性校正的模型进一步进行了分析。最后,在 BSR 校正热化学的背景下分析了向常见密度泛函添加经验色散项的好处。