Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anesthesiology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Oncol. 2013 Aug;52(6):1189-94. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.742960. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
The 7th TNM staging system for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) developed by the International Association for the study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) has been applied in Sweden since the beginning of the year 2010. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic role of the 7th TNM staging system in a surgical Swedish patient cohort with node-negative NSCLC.
We collected data from stage I patients (pT1-2 pN0, 6th TNM system) who underwent surgery for NSCLC at Karolinska University Hospital from 1987 to 2002. Tumors were restaged according to the 7th TNM version. Cox multivariate survival analysis was implemented in order to determine the prognostic impact of pathological stage when classified according to either the 6th or the 7th TNM systems.
The patient population consisted of 452 subjects. Tumor size was ≤ 3 cm in 51% of cases. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (53%) and lobectomy was the most common surgical procedure (82% of patients). The five-year survival rate in patients with stage IA vs. IB (6th TNM) was 62% vs. 51%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.036). Corresponding figures for the 7th TNM system were 70% in stage IA-T1a, 51% in stage IA-T1b, 54% in stage IB, 51% in stage IIA and 35% in stage IIB (log-rank p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, adjusted by age, gender, histology, kind of surgery, grade of differentiation and smoking status, pathological stage was an independent prognostic factor if classified according to the 7th TNM version (p = 0.001), but not if scored according to the 6th TNM edition (p = 0.090).
The 7th TNM classification system is a more accurate predictor of prognosis in stage I operated patients than the old classification. The new system should be implemented even on retrospective cohorts especially when investigating the prognostic implication of the expression of molecular biomarkers.
国际肺癌研究协会(IASLC)制定的第 7 版非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)TNM 分期系统自 2010 年初开始在瑞典应用。本回顾性研究的目的是评估 7 版 TNM 分期系统在瑞典 NSCLC 淋巴结阴性手术患者队列中的预后作用。
我们收集了在 1987 年至 2002 年期间在卡罗林斯卡大学医院接受 NSCLC 手术的 I 期患者(6 版 TNM 系统中的 pT1-2 pN0)的数据。根据第 7 版 TNM 版本对肿瘤进行重新分期。实施 Cox 多变量生存分析,以确定根据第 6 版或第 7 版 TNM 系统进行病理分期时的预后影响。
患者人群由 452 名患者组成。51%的病例肿瘤大小≤3cm。主要组织学类型为腺癌(53%),最常见的手术方式为肺叶切除术(82%的患者)。IA 期 vs. IB 期(6 版 TNM)患者的 5 年生存率分别为 62%和 51%(对数秩检验,p=0.036)。7 版 TNM 系统的相应数字分别为 IA-T1a 期 70%、IA-T1b 期 51%、IB 期 54%、IIA 期 51%和 IIB 期 35%(对数秩检验,p=0.002)。多变量分析显示,调整年龄、性别、组织学、手术类型、分化程度和吸烟状态后,根据第 7 版 TNM 版本进行病理分期是独立的预后因素(p=0.001),而根据第 6 版 TNM 版本进行分期则不是(p=0.090)。
第 7 版 TNM 分类系统是预测手术治疗 I 期患者预后的更准确指标,即使是回顾性队列,也应采用新系统,特别是在研究分子标志物表达的预后意义时。