Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Dec;125(23):4296-300.
Amputation-free survival (AFS) has been recommended as the gold standard for evaluating No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia (NO-CLI) therapy. Early-phase clinical trials suggest that autologous bone-marrow derived cells (BMCs) transplantation may have a positive effect on patients with NO-CLI, especially decreasing the incidence of amputation. However, the BMCs therapeutic efficacy remains controversial and whether BMCs therapy is suitable for all CLI patients is unclear.
We conducted a meta-analysis using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by comparing autologous BMCs therapy with controls in patients with critical limb ischemia, and the primary endpoint is the incidence of amputation. Pubmed, EBSCO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to approximately July 25, 2012) were searched.
Seven RCTs with 373 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. Because serious disease was the main reason leading to amputation in one trial, six studies with 333 patients were finally included in the meta-analysis. Pooling the data of the final six studies, we found that BMCs therapy significantly decreased the incidence of amputation in patients with CLI (odds ratio (OR), 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22 to 0.62; P = 0.0002), and the efficacy had not significantly declined within 6 months after BMCs were transplanted; OR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.16 to 0.70; P = 0.004 within 6 months and OR, 0.30; 95%CI, 0.11 to 0.79; P = 0.01 within 3 months. The rate of AFS after BMCs therapy was significantly increased in patients with Rutherford class 5 CLI (OR 3.28; 95%CI, 1.12 to 9.65; P = 0.03), while there was no significant improvement in patients with Rutherford class 4 (OR 0.35; 95%CI, 0.05 to 2.33; P = 0.28) compared with controls. The BMCs therapy also improved ulcer healing (OR, 5.83; 95%CI, 2.37 to 14.29; P = 0.0001).
Our analysis suggests that autologous BMCs therapy has a beneficial effect in decreasing the incidence of amputation and the efficacy does not decrease significantly within 6 months after BMCs transplantation. Patients with Rutherford class 5 are suitable for BMCs therapy, while the efficiency in patients with Rutherford 4 needs further evaluation.
保肢存活(AFS)已被推荐作为评价无选择的严重肢体缺血(NO-CLI)治疗的金标准。早期临床试验表明,自体骨髓来源细胞(BMCs)移植可能对 NO-CLI 患者有积极作用,特别是降低截肢的发生率。然而,BMCs 的治疗效果仍存在争议,并且 BMCs 治疗是否适用于所有 CLI 患者尚不清楚。
我们通过比较自体 BMCs 治疗与对照组在严重肢体缺血患者中的疗效,进行了一项荟萃分析,主要终点是截肢的发生率。检索了 Pubmed、EBSCO 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(截至 2012 年 7 月 25 日)。
共有 7 项 RCT 纳入了 373 例患者,其中一项研究中严重疾病是导致截肢的主要原因。最终纳入了 6 项 RCT 共 333 例患者进行荟萃分析。对最终 6 项研究的数据进行汇总分析,发现 BMCs 治疗可显著降低 CLI 患者的截肢发生率(比值比(OR),0.37;95%置信区间(CI),0.22 至 0.62;P=0.0002),并且在 BMCs 移植后 6 个月内疗效没有明显下降;OR,0.33;95%CI,0.16 至 0.70;P=0.004,在 6 个月内,OR,0.30;95%CI,0.11 至 0.79;P=0.01,在 3 个月内。Rutherford 5 级 CLI 患者的 BMCs 治疗后 AFS 率显著增加(OR,3.28;95%CI,1.12 至 9.65;P=0.03),而 Rutherford 4 级患者与对照组相比无明显改善(OR,0.35;95%CI,0.05 至 2.33;P=0.28)。BMCs 治疗还可促进溃疡愈合(OR,5.83;95%CI,2.37 至 14.29;P=0.0001)。
我们的分析表明,自体 BMCs 治疗可降低截肢发生率,且在 BMCs 移植后 6 个月内疗效无明显下降。Rutherford 5 级患者适合接受 BMCs 治疗,而 Rutherford 4 级患者的疗效需要进一步评估。