Cardiovascular Medicine Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.006.
Conflicts of interest (COIs) are common and important in cardiovascular medicine. Although COIs do not automatically lead to bias, conflicts between financial considerations, fame, promotion, etc., threaten valued interests such as objectivity, integrity, patient protection and cost-savings. Strategies for managing COIs include disclosure, limitations and eliminations, each of which is employed in varying degrees by universities, funding and regulatory agencies, journal editors, providers of continuing medical education and professional societies. This paper describes benefits and pitfalls inherent in each of these strategies. There is no "gold standard" for the dealing with COIs in cardiovascular medicine, but finding ways to manage unavoidable COIs without compromising the benefits of productive relationships between investigators and industry will be essential to preserving valued interests and public trust in the cardiovascular profession.
利益冲突(COIs)在心血管医学中很常见且很重要。尽管 COIs 并不自动导致偏见,但财务考虑、名誉、晋升等方面的冲突会威胁到客观性、完整性、患者保护和节省成本等有价值的利益。管理 COIs 的策略包括披露、限制和消除,大学、资助和监管机构、期刊编辑、继续医学教育提供者和专业协会都在不同程度上采用了这些策略。本文描述了这些策略各自固有的优点和缺陷。在心血管医学中处理 COIs 没有“金标准”,但找到在不损害研究人员和行业之间富有成效的关系的利益的情况下管理不可避免的 COIs 的方法,对于维护有价值的利益和公众对心血管专业的信任至关重要。