Suppr超能文献

在资源匮乏国家,对患者进行起搏器再利用:有总比没有好吗?

Pacemaker reuse for patients in resource poor countries: is something always better than nothing?

机构信息

The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5853, USA.

出版信息

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.002.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death across the globe. Large disparities in access to cardiovascular care exist in the world. An estimated one million people die each year due to lack of access to life saving pacemaker therapy. We discuss the concept of justice in health and health care as it relates to the use of refurbished pacemakers in patients in low- and middle- income countries, where financial circumstances severely limit access to brand new devices. Egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and justice as fairness are examined, as they relate to provision of re-processed pacemakers. This practice, since it holds promise to improve human functioning and capabilities, can be morally justified with some conditions: transparency, further research in is its safety and efficacy, and its impact on other needs and priorities in those countries.

摘要

心血管疾病是全球范围内最常见的死亡原因。全球范围内在获得心血管护理方面存在着巨大的差异。据估计,每年有 100 万人因无法获得挽救生命的起搏器治疗而死亡。我们讨论了卫生和医疗保健中的正义概念,因为它与在中低收入国家中使用翻新起搏器有关,在这些国家,经济状况严重限制了对全新设备的获取。我们考察了平等主义、功利主义和公平正义,因为它们与提供再处理起搏器有关。这种做法由于有提高人类功能和能力的潜力,因此在一定条件下是可以在道德上证明其合理性的:透明度、进一步研究其安全性和有效性,以及它对这些国家其他需求和优先事项的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验