Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Nov;111(11):617-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The impact of the introduction of newer anti-diabetic agents on the treatment pattern in the booming diabetic population remains unclear. We examined the patterns and temporal trends of anti-diabetic drug use in Taiwan, with particular emphasis on combination therapy.
We searched the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database during 2000-2009 to identify outpatient prescriptions of anti-diabetic drugs, including human insulins and insulin analogues, sulfonylureas, glinides, metformin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Glucose-lowering treatments were classified according to pattern (oral agents only, insulins only, and oral agents and insulins combined) and a number of different classes of anti-diabetic drugs. Insulin therapy and combination therapy with two oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) were further classified according to individual drug combination patterns.
Although metformin remained the mainstay of anti-diabetic treatment, patients receiving combination therapy of oral glucose-lowering agents, either with or without insulin, significantly increased, from approximately 40% in 2000 to 60% in 2009, particularly in relation to the newer agents, including glinides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and long-acting insulin analogues. Use of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones decreased substantially. For insulin therapy, the most commonly prescribed drugs were premix insulin analogues and basal insulin analogues, accounting for one-third of total insulin prescriptions in 2009.
We found an increasing complexity of anti-diabetic therapy during the past decade in Taiwan. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this treatment pattern will lead to improved clinical outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness.
背景/目的:新型抗糖尿病药物的引入对蓬勃发展的糖尿病患者群体的治疗模式的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了台湾地区抗糖尿病药物使用的模式和时间趋势,特别强调了联合治疗。
我们在 2000 年至 2009 年期间在台湾全民健康保险数据库中搜索了门诊抗糖尿病药物处方,包括人胰岛素和胰岛素类似物、磺酰脲类、格列奈类、二甲双胍、噻唑烷二酮类、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂。根据模式(仅口服药物、仅胰岛素和口服药物和胰岛素联合)和不同类别的抗糖尿病药物将降血糖治疗进行分类。胰岛素治疗和两种口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)的联合治疗根据个体药物联合模式进一步分类。
尽管二甲双胍仍然是抗糖尿病治疗的主要药物,但接受口服降糖药物联合治疗(无论是否联合胰岛素)的患者显著增加,从 2000 年的约 40%增加到 2009 年的 60%,尤其是与新型药物相关,包括格列奈类、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和长效胰岛素类似物。磺酰脲类和噻唑烷二酮类的使用大幅减少。对于胰岛素治疗,最常开的药物是预混胰岛素类似物和基础胰岛素类似物,2009 年占总胰岛素处方的三分之一。
我们发现过去十年中台湾地区抗糖尿病治疗的复杂性不断增加。需要进一步研究以评估这种治疗模式是否会在成本效益方面改善临床结果。