• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心室辅助装置并发症对移植后生存的影响:对美国器官共享网络数据库的分析。

Impact of ventricular assist device complications on posttransplant survival: an analysis of the United network of organ sharing database.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Mar;95(3):870-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.080. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.080
PMID:23218024
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although current left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology has proven more durable than first-generation devices, all mechanical devices are prone to complications that can elevate patient acuity before transplantation. LVAD patients with complications intuitively carry a higher risk profile than other status 1A LVAD patients who are generally stable and use their 30 days of clinically stable status 1A time. We sought to determine if the presence or absence of complications in status 1A LVAD patients at the time of transplant influenced survival after transplant.

METHODS

The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively analyzed for 15,253 patients who were listed status 1A from 1998 to 2008. Survival after transplant survival was compared between patients who were and were not listed for LVAD-related complications. Standard statistical analysis was applied.

RESULTS

No survival difference was identified at 1 and 10 years after transplant in patients who had device complications compared with those without complications. Of the five complication entries (thromboembolism, infection, malfunction, malignant arrhythmia, and other), only device infection increased mortality risk compared with noncomplicated patients (39% at 1 year, 30% at 10 years, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes are generally not affected by the status 1A listing criteria for patients bridged to transplant with LVADs. However, the subset of patients with device infection had worse 1-year and 10-year posttransplant survival. Bridge to transplant patients, despite serious device-related complications, still have excellent transplant outcomes.

摘要

背景

尽管目前的左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 技术比第一代设备更耐用,但所有机械装置都容易发生并发症,这些并发症在移植前会使患者病情恶化。与一般稳定且使用 30 天临床稳定 1A 状态的其他 1A 状态 LVAD 患者相比,具有并发症的 LVAD 患者直观地具有更高的风险状况。我们试图确定在移植时处于 1A 状态的 LVAD 患者是否存在并发症会影响移植后的生存。

方法

回顾性分析了 1998 年至 2008 年期间在 15253 名患者中列出的 1A 状态的美国器官共享网络数据库。比较了移植后具有和不具有 LVAD 相关并发症的患者的移植后生存情况。应用标准统计分析。

结果

与无并发症患者相比,在移植后 1 年和 10 年,具有设备并发症的患者没有生存差异。在五个并发症条目(血栓栓塞、感染、故障、恶性心律失常和其他)中,只有设备感染与非复杂患者相比增加了死亡率风险(1 年时为 39%,10 年时为 30%,p<0.01)。

结论

对于用 LVAD 桥接移植的患者,长期结果通常不受列入 1A 状态的标准影响。然而,具有设备感染的患者亚组在移植后 1 年和 10 年的生存率较差。尽管存在严重的设备相关并发症,桥接移植患者仍有极好的移植结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of ventricular assist device complications on posttransplant survival: an analysis of the United network of organ sharing database.心室辅助装置并发症对移植后生存的影响:对美国器官共享网络数据库的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Mar;95(3):870-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.080. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
2
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.在当前接受连续流左心室辅助装置的患者中,心脏移植后的存活率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095.
4
Transplant registrants with implanted left ventricular assist devices have insufficient risk to justify elective organ procurement and transplantation network status 1A time.移植登记患者中使用植入式左心室辅助装置的患者风险不足以为其进行器官获取和移植网络状态 1A 时间的选择性移植提供正当理由。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.031. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
5
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
6
Impact of left ventricular assist device bridging on posttransplant outcomes.左心室辅助装置桥接对移植后结局的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Nov;88(5):1457-61; discussion 1461. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.021.
7
Survival on the heart transplant waiting list: impact of continuous flow left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplant.心脏移植等待名单上的存活率:连续流动左心室辅助装置作为移植桥的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):830-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.019. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome?使用心室辅助装置成功过渡对心脏移植结果有何影响?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;13(4):405-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.273722. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
Effects of Systemic and Device-Related Complications in Patients Bridged to Transplantation With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置桥接移植患者的全身和器械相关并发症的影响。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
10
Continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology has influenced wait times and affected donor allocation in cardiac transplantation.连续流动左心室辅助装置技术已经影响了心脏移植的等待时间和供体分配。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jun;147(6):1966-71, 1971.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置患者等待名单死亡率的风险预测模型
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 19;10:100337. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100337. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
The good, the bad, the ugly: Optimal left ventricular assist device duration in bridge to transplantation.优点、缺点、难点:心脏移植过渡中左心室辅助装置的最佳使用时长
JTCVS Open. 2021 Oct 22;8:116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.10.013. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Pre-operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular-assist device patients.
左心室辅助装置患者的机械通气管感染术前危险因素。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Dec;9(6):3995-4002. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14112. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Complications of left ventricular assist devices causing high urgency status on waiting list: impact on outcome after heart transplantation.左心室辅助装置的并发症导致在等待名单上处于高度紧急状态:对心脏移植后结局的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1253-1262. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13188. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era.全面解析:现代左心室辅助装置感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 17;7(5):ofaa124. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa124. eCollection 2020 May.
6
Epidemiology and management of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections in non-neutropenic immunosuppressed patients: a review of the literature.非中性粒细胞减少的免疫抑制患者医疗相关血流感染的流行病学与管理:文献综述
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;4(6):171-191. doi: 10.1177/2049936117733394. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
7
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing).社会经济地位对接受左心室辅助装置支持的患者的影响:器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库分析
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;9(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003215.
8
The Impact of Obesity on Patients Bridged to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.肥胖对使用连续流左心室辅助装置过渡到移植的患者的影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;4(10):761-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
9
Mechanical circulatory support in heart failure.心力衰竭中的机械循环支持
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016 Jun;13(2):130-4. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2016.61046. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
10
Ventricular assist devices as bridge to heart transplantation: impact on post-transplant infections.作为心脏移植桥梁的心室辅助装置:对移植后感染的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 8;16:321. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1658-0.