Spinal Cord Injury Center, University of Zurich, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Pain. 2013 Feb;154(2):235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
Following nociceptive heat or laser stimulation, an early contralateral and later vertex potential can be recorded. Although more indicative of the nociceptive input, the acquisition of the contralateral N1 after contact heat stimulation (contact heat-evoked potentials [CHEPs]) remains difficult. An advantage of contact heat is that the baseline skin temperature preceding peak stimulation can be controlled. Increasing the baseline temperature may represent a novel strategy to improve the acquisition of CHEPs without resulting in more subjective pain to stimulation. A study was undertaken in 23 healthy subjects to examine the effects of increasing the baseline temperature but not the perceived intensity of contact heat stimulation. A combined standard averaging and single-trial analysis was performed to disclose how changes in averaged waveforms related to latency jitter and individual trial amplitudes. By increasing the baseline temperature, the acquisition of N1 was improved among subjects with a low-amplitude response (greater than -4μV) following 35°C baseline temperature stimulation (P<.05). Based on standard averaging, N2/P2 amplitudes were also significantly increased with and without an accompanying change in the rating of perceived pain when the baseline temperature was increased (P<.05). In contrast, automated single-trial averaging revealed no significant difference in N2 amplitude when the baseline temperature was increased to 42°C and the peak temperature reduced. These findings suggest that 2 mechanisms underlie the improved acquisition of CHEPs: increased synchronization of afferent volley, yielding larger-amplitude evoked potentials in response to the same rating of intensity; and reduced inter-trial variability.
在接受伤害性热或激光刺激后,可记录到早期对侧和晚期顶点电位。尽管对伤害性输入更具指示性,但接触热刺激(接触热诱发电位 [CHEPs])后对侧 N1 的获取仍然很困难。接触热的一个优点是可以控制在达到峰值刺激之前的基线皮肤温度。增加基线温度可能是一种提高 CHEPs 获取的新策略,而不会导致刺激的主观疼痛增加。本研究在 23 名健康受试者中进行,以检查在不增加接触热刺激感知强度的情况下增加基线温度的影响。采用标准平均和单次试验分析相结合的方法,揭示平均波形的变化与潜伏期抖动和个体试验幅度之间的关系。通过增加基线温度,可以改善基线温度为 35°C 刺激后低幅度反应(大于-4μV)的受试者的 N1 获得(P<.05)。基于标准平均,当基线温度升高时,即使感知疼痛的评分没有伴随变化,N2/P2 幅度也会显著增加(P<.05)。相比之下,当基线温度升高至 42°C 且峰值温度降低时,自动单次试验平均显示 N2 幅度没有显著差异。这些发现表明,2 种机制可解释 CHEPs 获取的改善:传入冲动同步增加,导致在相同强度评分下产生更大幅度的诱发电位;以及试验间变异性降低。