兔精液的冷冻保存:比较不同冷冻保护剂、无冷冻保护剂的玻璃化冷冻以及在标准蒸汽冷冻和玻璃化冷冻后使用白蛋白加渗透保护剂对精子存活和生育力的影响。

Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.

出版信息

Theriogenology. 2013 Feb;79(3):508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.11.008. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

Abstract

This study was designed to improve current freezing protocols for rabbit sperm by examining: (1) the toxicity of different permeable cryoprotectants (CPAs) used for standard vapor freezing (conventional freezing); (2) the feasibility of ultrarapid nonequilibrium freezing (vitrification) of sperm in the absence of permeating CPAs; and (3), the addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA), alone or with sucrose or trehalose as osmoprotectants. First, we evaluated the effects on sperm motility of the incubation time (5 to 60 minutes) with different final concentrations (5% to 20%) of glycerol, N-N-dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and methanol. N-N-dimethylacetamide (5%) and DMSO (5% and 10%) showed the least toxic effects; the use of 10% DMSO producing the best postthaw sperm motility and membrane integrity results (P < 0.05) after conventional freezing. For vitrification, semen was diluted in the absence of permeable CPAs and frozen by dropping semen directly in liquid nitrogen. However, this led to the low or null cryosurvival of sperm postvitrification (0.16 ± 0.4%, 1.8 ± 1.6%, and 94.5 ± 1.4% of motile, membrane-, and DNA-intact sperm cells, respectively). To assess the effects of albumin and osmoprotectants on sperm cryosurvival, sperm was conventionally frozen with 10% DMSO or vitrified in the absence of permeable CPAs without or with 0.5% BSA alone or combined with sucrose or trehalose (range, 0-0.25 M). In the conventional freezing procedure, the addition of BSA alone failed to improve sperm cryosurvival, however, in the presence of BSA plus either sucrose or trehalose, the postthaw motility (using 0.1 M sucrose or trehalose) and DNA integrity (using all additive concentrations) of sperm were significantly better (P < 0.05) than control. Higher numbers of motile and membrane-intact cells were observed when semen was vitrified with BSA alone or with BSA and sucrose (0.1 and 0.25 M) or BSA and trehalose (0.25 M) and a best recovery of DNA-intact sperm was recorded for BSA plus sucrose compared with semen vitrified without osmoprotectants (P < 0.05). Finally, the cryodiluent combinations BSA/sucrose and BSA/trehalose were compared in an insemination trial. Rabbit does were inseminated with fresh semen (N = 56), semen conventionally cryopreserved in the BSA-based cryodiluents containing 0.1 M sucrose or trehalose (N = 56 per group), or semen vitrified in the presence of 0.25 M sucrose or trehalose (N = 8 per group). Fertility rates and live born kids were similar for semen cryopreserved with BSA/sucrose (77% and 7.6) compared with fresh semen (84% and 8.1) and significantly higher than the figures recorded for the conventionally frozen semen in the BSA/trehalose group (52% and 6.1; P ≤ 0.05). In contrast, only one doe inseminated with semen vitrified in the presence of BSA/sucrose became pregnant, though no kids were delivered. The conclusions to be drawn from our study are: (1) incubation times and concentration toxicities established for the main permeable CPAs used for conventional freezing of rabbit sperm indicated that DMSO 10% was the least damaging; (2) CPA-free vitrification of rabbit semen led to a low or null sperm cryosurvival; and (3) enriching the freezing medium with BSA plus adequate amounts of sucrose or trehalose can improve the cryosurvival of rabbit sperm after conventional freezing or vitrification. In our working conditions, BSA/sucrose was more effective than BSA/trehalose at preserving the in vivo fertilization capacity of rabbit sperm cryopreserved using the standard procedure.

摘要

本研究旨在通过以下方法改进目前用于兔精子的冷冻方案

(1) 研究用于标准蒸汽冷冻的不同渗透冷冻保护剂 (CPA) 的毒性;(2) 研究在没有渗透 CPA 的情况下,精子的超快速非平衡冷冻(玻璃化)的可行性;以及 (3) 添加牛血清白蛋白 (BSA) ,单独或与蔗糖或海藻糖作为渗透保护剂。首先,我们评估了在不同最终浓度 (5%至 20%) 的甘油、N-N-二甲基乙酰胺、二甲基亚砜 (DMSO)、乙二醇、丙二醇和甲醇中孵育 5 至 60 分钟对精子活力的影响。N-N-二甲基乙酰胺 (5%) 和 DMSO (5% 和 10%) 显示出最小的毒性作用;使用 10% DMSO 可获得最佳的冷冻后精子活力和膜完整性结果(P < 0.05)传统冷冻。对于玻璃化,在没有渗透 CPA 的情况下稀释精液,并直接将精液滴入液氮中冷冻。然而,这导致玻璃化后精子的冷冻存活率很低或为零(分别为 0.16 ± 0.4%、1.8 ± 1.6% 和 94.5 ± 1.4%的运动、膜和 DNA 完整的精子细胞)。为了评估白蛋白和渗透保护剂对精子冷冻存活率的影响,用 10% DMSO 常规冷冻精子或在没有渗透 CPA 的情况下玻璃化精子,不添加或添加 0.5% BSA 单独或与蔗糖或海藻糖结合(范围为 0-0.25 M)。在常规冷冻程序中,单独添加 BSA 未能提高精子的冷冻存活率,然而,在添加 BSA 加蔗糖或海藻糖的情况下,冷冻后精子的活力(使用 0.1 M 蔗糖或海藻糖)和 DNA 完整性(使用所有添加浓度)显著提高(P < 0.05)与对照组相比。当精液单独用 BSA 或 BSA 和蔗糖(0.1 和 0.25 M)或 BSA 和海藻糖(0.25 M)玻璃化时,观察到更多的运动和膜完整的细胞,并且与没有渗透保护剂的精液玻璃化相比,记录到 BSA 加蔗糖的 DNA 完整精子的最佳回收率(P < 0.05)。最后,在授精试验中比较了 BSA/蔗糖和 BSA/海藻糖的冷冻稀释剂组合。用新鲜精液(N = 56)、含 0.1 M 蔗糖或海藻糖的 BSA 基冷冻稀释剂中常规冷冻的精液(每组 N = 56)或含 0.25 M 蔗糖或海藻糖的精液玻璃化(每组 N = 8)对母兔进行授精。与新鲜精液(84%和 8.1)相比,用 BSA/蔗糖冷冻保存的精液(77%和 7.6)的受精率和活产仔数相似,显著高于 BSA/海藻糖组中常规冷冻精液的数值(52%和 6.1;P ≤ 0.05)。相比之下,只有一只用 BSA/蔗糖存在下玻璃化的母兔怀孕,但没有产仔。从我们的研究中得出的结论是:(1) 为兔精子常规冷冻建立的主要渗透 CPA 的孵育时间和浓度毒性表明 DMSO 10% 的损伤最小;(2) 兔精液无 CPA 玻璃化导致精子冷冻存活率低或为零;(3) 在冷冻培养基中添加 BSA 加适量的蔗糖或海藻糖可以提高兔精子的冷冻存活率,无论是常规冷冻还是玻璃化。在我们的工作条件下,BSA/蔗糖在保存标准程序冷冻的兔精子的体内受精能力方面比 BSA/海藻糖更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索