Suppr超能文献

移位的两部分近端肱骨骨折的外固定

External fixation for displaced 2-part proximal humeral fractures.

作者信息

Benetos Ioannis S, Karampinas Panayiotis K, Mavrogenis Andreas F, Romoudis Pavlos, Pneumaticos Spiros G, Vlamis John

机构信息

Third Department of Orthopaedics, Athens University Medical School, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2012 Dec;35(12):e1732-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121120-17.

Abstract

Studies have reported conflicting results regarding external fixation for displaced proximal humeral fractures. Compared with open reduction and internal fixation, external fixation for displaced proximal humeral fractures avoids dissection and soft tissue stripping and leads to higher union rates, a lower incidence of avascular necrosis, less scaring of the scapulohumeral interface, and faster rehabilitation. Some authors have reported good or excellent results and minimum complications compared with open reduction and internal fixation; however, others have reported that external fixation does not ensure acceptable reduction and fracture stability, especially in patients with osteoporosis.This article describes 18 patients with displaced 2-part fractures of the surgical neck of the humerus treated with closed reduction and external fixation using the Tension Guide Fixator (Gexfix SA, Carouge, Switzerland) external fixation system between 2010 and 2011. The patients included 14 women and 4 men with a mean age of 39 years. Mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 15-24 months). Fracture union; function using the Constant score, University of California Los Angeles score, Oxford score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand shoulder score; and complications were evaluated. All patients experienced fracture union at a mean of 11 weeks (range, 9-13 weeks). The Tension Guide Fixator was removed without anesthesia at the outpatient clinic at a mean of 6 weeks (range, 4-8 weeks) with no loss of reduction or secondary displacement after removal. At 1-year follow-up, mean Constant and University of California Los Angeles scores were excellent, mean Oxford score showed satisfactory joint function, and mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score showed minimal pain with no disability.

摘要

关于移位型肱骨近端骨折的外固定治疗,研究报告的结果相互矛盾。与切开复位内固定相比,移位型肱骨近端骨折的外固定避免了切开和软组织剥离,具有更高的愈合率、更低的缺血性坏死发生率、更少的肩胛肱关节界面瘢痕形成以及更快的康复速度。一些作者报告称,与切开复位内固定相比,外固定的效果良好或极佳,并发症最少;然而,另一些作者则报告称,外固定不能确保获得可接受的复位和骨折稳定性,尤其是在骨质疏松患者中。本文描述了2010年至2011年间,18例肱骨外科颈二部分移位骨折患者采用张力导向固定器(Gexfix SA,瑞士卡罗格)外固定系统进行闭合复位和外固定治疗的情况。患者包括14名女性和4名男性,平均年龄39岁。平均随访时间为18个月(范围15 - 24个月)。评估了骨折愈合情况、使用Constant评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校评分、牛津评分以及上肢、肩部和手部快速残疾评定量表肩部评分的功能情况,以及并发症情况。所有患者平均在11周(范围9 - 13周)时实现骨折愈合。张力导向固定器平均在6周(范围4 - 8周)时在门诊无需麻醉即可拆除,拆除后无复位丢失或二次移位。在1年随访时,Constant和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校的平均评分极佳,牛津平均评分显示关节功能满意,上肢、肩部和手部快速残疾评定量表的平均评分显示疼痛轻微,无功能障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验