Giannicola Giuseppe, Polimanti David, Sacchetti Federico M, Scacchi Marco, Bullitta Gianluca, Manauzzi Erica, Gumina Stefano, Cinotti Gianluca
Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Orthopedics. 2012 Dec;35(12):e1746-53. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121120-19.
The surgical procedures for and outcomes of soft tissue constraint reconstruction in complex elbow instability have been rarely investigated. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes in a series of patients with complex elbow instability in whom the associated soft tissue constraint injures were identified and treated based on the pathoanatomic changes found intraoperatively. Forty-five patients (23 men and 22 women; mean age, 54 years) with complex elbow instability were followed prospectively. Surgical treatment included the anatomic reduction and internal fixation of any fracture and radial head replacement in Mason type III injuries. Soft tissue constraint lesions were then repaired based on the type of lesion (eg, proximal or distal ligament avulsion, middle-zone lesion, or presence of detached bony fragments). Posterolateral capsular lesions and common extensor and flexor origin injuries were also repaired. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically after a mean of 25 months. Functional range of motion was achieved in 39 (86%) patients. Average Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score were 94, 5.6, and 89, respectively. At last follow-up, 42 (93%) patients showed no evidence of elbow instability, 2 (4%) patients had mild varus instability, and 1 (2%) patient had moderate posterolateral instability. The accurate identification of pathoanatomic changes of elbow soft tissue constraint lesions associated with complex elbow instability is an essential prerequisite to planning proper surgical treatment. The results of this study show that, in patients with complex elbow instability, once the fracture has been treated and each type of soft tissue constraint lesion adequately repaired, a high percentage of satisfactory functional outcomes may be achieved.
复杂肘关节不稳定中软组织约束重建的手术方法及结果鲜有研究。本研究旨在分析一系列复杂肘关节不稳定患者的临床结果,这些患者术中根据病理解剖变化确定并治疗相关软组织约束损伤。对45例(23例男性和22例女性;平均年龄54岁)复杂肘关节不稳定患者进行前瞻性随访。手术治疗包括对任何骨折进行解剖复位和内固定,以及对梅森III型损伤进行桡骨头置换。然后根据损伤类型(如近端或远端韧带撕脱、中间区损伤或存在游离骨碎片)修复软组织约束损伤。后外侧关节囊损伤以及伸肌和屈肌总起点损伤也进行修复。平均随访25个月后对患者进行临床和影像学随访。39例(86%)患者实现了功能活动范围。平均梅奥肘关节功能评分、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分以及美国肩肘外科医生协会肩部评分分别为94分、5.6分和89分。在最后一次随访时,42例(93%)患者未出现肘关节不稳定迹象,2例(4%)患者有轻度内翻不稳定,1例(2%)患者有中度后外侧不稳定。准确识别与复杂肘关节不稳定相关的肘关节软组织约束损伤的病理解剖变化是规划适当手术治疗的必要前提。本研究结果表明,在复杂肘关节不稳定患者中,一旦骨折得到治疗且每种软组织约束损伤得到充分修复,可能会获得较高比例的满意功能结果。