Suppr超能文献

一种用于记录盆底肌肌电活动的差动抽吸电极:串扰评估。

A differential suction electrode for recording electromyographic activity from the pelvic floor muscles: crosstalk evaluation.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Apr;23(2):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a differential suction electrode (DSE) probe is less prone to recording crosstalk from the hip adductors or external rotators than the Femiscan™ probe when recording electromyography (EMG) data from the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs). Twenty nulliparous, continent women performed hip adduction and hip external rotation contractions at 25%, 50% and 100% of maximal voluntary effort both while keeping their PFMs relaxed and while contracting their PFMs as strongly as possible. All tasks were performed while DSEs were adhered to the vaginal wall at the level of the pubococcygeus group bilaterally, and also with the Femiscan™ probe in situ. The order of the probes was randomized. For each task, the peak smoothed PFM EMG amplitude was compared between hip forces and probes using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the interaction between contraction level and probe (α = 0.05). There was a significant contraction level by probe interaction for each task. In most cases the Femiscan™ probe recorded significantly higher PFM EMG activity during hip adduction and external rotation tasks at 25% and 50% MVC compared to what it recorded when the hip musculature remained relaxed, whereas the DSE probe did not. As such, the DSE probe appears to be less susceptible to crosstalk from the hip adductors and external rotators than the Femiscan™ probe at these hip muscle contraction levels. Both probes recorded significantly higher EMG activity when maximal contractions of the hip adductors and external rotators were performed therefore, no conclusion can be made regarding whether the activity recorded from the PFMs during maximal hip adduction and external rotation is the result of crosstalk or co-activation.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在记录盆底肌肌电图(EMG)数据时,与 Femiscan™ 探头相比,差分抽吸电极(DSE)探头是否更不易受到髋关节内收肌或外旋肌的串扰。20 名未生育、有节制的女性在保持盆底肌放松和尽可能强烈地收缩盆底肌的情况下,以 25%、50%和 100%的最大自主努力分别进行髋关节内收和髋关节外展收缩。所有任务均在 DSE 紧贴阴道壁的情况下进行,双侧位于耻骨尾骨肌组水平,同时也将 Femiscan™ 探头原位放置。探头的顺序是随机的。对于每个任务,使用双因素重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)比较髋关节力和探头之间的峰值平滑 PFM EMG 幅度,包括收缩水平和探头之间的相互作用(α=0.05)。每个任务都存在收缩水平和探头的显著相互作用。在大多数情况下,与髋关节肌肉保持放松时相比,Femiscan™ 探头在髋关节内收和外展任务的 25%和 50% MVC 时记录的 PFM EMG 活动明显更高,而 DSE 探头则没有。因此,与 Femiscan™ 探头相比,在这些髋关节肌肉收缩水平下,DSE 探头似乎不易受到髋关节内收肌和外旋肌的串扰。当最大程度地收缩髋关节内收肌和外旋肌时,两个探头都记录到了明显更高的 EMG 活动,因此,无法确定在最大髋关节内收和外展时从 PFMs 记录到的活动是串扰还是共同激活的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验