Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Feb 15;111(4):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.032. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
Current models incompletely risk-stratify patients with acute chest pain. In this study, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cystatin C were incorporated into a contemporary chest pain triage algorithm in a clinically stratified population to improve acute coronary syndrome discrimination. Adult patients with chest pain presenting without myocardial infarction (n = 382) were prospectively enrolled from 2008 to 2009. After clinical risk stratification, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cystatin C were measured and standard care was performed. The primary end point was the result of a clinical stress test. The secondary end point was any major adverse cardiac event at 6 months. Associations were determined through multivariate stratified analyses. In the low-risk group, 76 of 78 patients with normal levels of the 2 biomarkers had normal stress test results (negative predictive value 97%). Normal biomarkers predicted normal stress test results with an odds ratio of 10.56 (p = 0.006). In contrast, 26 of 33 intermediate-risk patients with normal levels of the 2 biomarkers had normal stress test results (negative predictive value 79%). Biomarkers and stress test results were not associated in the intermediate-risk group (odds ratio 2.48, p = 0.09). There were 42 major adverse cardiac events in the overall cohort. No major adverse cardiac events occurred at 6 months in the low-risk subgroup that underwent stress testing. In conclusion, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cystatin C levels predict the results of stress tests in low-risk patients with chest pain but should not be substituted for stress testing in intermediate-risk patients. There is potential for their use in the early discharge of low-risk patients after clinical risk stratification.
当前的模型不能完全对急性胸痛患者进行风险分层。在这项研究中,N 末端脑钠肽前体和胱抑素 C 被纳入到一个当代胸痛分诊算法中,以改善急性冠状动脉综合征的鉴别诊断。从 2008 年到 2009 年,前瞻性地招募了来自临床分层人群的无心肌梗死的胸痛成年患者(n=382)。在进行临床风险分层后,测量 N 末端脑钠肽前体和胱抑素 C,并进行标准治疗。主要终点是临床应激试验的结果。次要终点是 6 个月时的任何主要不良心脏事件。通过多变量分层分析确定关联。在低危组中,2 种生物标志物水平正常的 78 例患者中有 76 例应激试验结果正常(阴性预测值 97%)。正常的生物标志物预测正常的应激试验结果的比值比为 10.56(p=0.006)。相反,2 种生物标志物水平正常的 33 例中危患者中有 26 例应激试验结果正常(阴性预测值 79%)。在中危组中,生物标志物和应激试验结果没有关联(比值比 2.48,p=0.09)。整个队列中有 42 例主要不良心脏事件。在接受应激试验的低危亚组中,6 个月时没有发生主要不良心脏事件。总之,N 末端脑钠肽前体和胱抑素 C 水平可预测低危胸痛患者的应激试验结果,但不应替代中危患者的应激试验。在对临床风险分层后的低危患者进行早期出院时,它们可能有一定的应用潜力。