Suppr超能文献

不同补饲策略对放牧奶牛产奶量的影响。

Effects of different strategies for feeding supplements on milk production responses in cows grazing a restricted pasture allowance.

机构信息

Future Farming Systems Research Division, Department of Primary Industries, Ellinbank, VIC 3821, Australia.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2013 Feb;96(2):1218-31. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6079. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

Abstract

Milk production responses of grazing cows offered supplements in different ways were measured. Holstein-Friesian cows, averaging 227 d in milk, were allocated into 6 groups of 36, with 2 groups randomly assigned to each of 3 feeding strategies: (1) cows grazed perennial ryegrass pasture supplemented with milled barley grain fed in the milking parlor and pasture silage offered in the paddock (control); (2) same pasture and allotment supplemented with the same amounts of milled barley grain and pasture silage, but presented as a mixed ration after each milking (PMR 1); and (3) same pasture and allotment, supplemented with a mixed ration of milled barley grain, alfalfa hay, corn silage, and crushed corn grain (PMR 2). For all strategies, supplements provided the same metabolizable energy and grain:forage ratio. [75:25, dry matter (DM) basis]. Each group of 36 cows was further allocated into 4 groups of 9, which were assigned to receive 6, 8, 10, or 12 kg of supplement DM/cow per day. Thus, there were 2 replicated groups per supplement amount per dietary strategy. The experiment had a 14-d adaptation period and an 11-d measurement period. Pasture allotment was approximately 14 kg of DM/d for all cows and was offered in addition to the supplement. Positive quadratic responses to increasing amounts of supplement were observed for yield of milk, energy-corrected milk (ECM), and fat and protein, and positive linear responses for concentrations of fat and protein for cows on all 3 supplement feeding strategies. No difference existed between feeding strategy groups in yield of milk, ECM, or protein at any amount of supplement offered, but yield and concentration of fat was higher in PMR 2 cows compared with control and PMR 1 cows at the highest amounts of supplementation. Responses in marginal ECM production per additional kilogram of supplement were also greater for PMR 2 than control and PMR 1 cows when large amounts of supplement were consumed. For all diets, marked daily variation occurred in ruminal fluid volatile fatty acids and pH, especially in cows fed the largest amounts of supplement. It was concluded that when supplements are fed to grazing dairy cows, a simple mix of grain and pasture silage has no benefit over traditional strategies of feeding grain in the parlor and forage in the paddock. However, yield of milk fat and marginal milk production responses can be greater if the strategy uses an isoenergetic ration that also contains alfalfa hay, corn silage, and corn grain.

摘要

对以不同方式补饲的放牧奶牛的产奶量反应进行了测量。荷斯坦-弗里生奶牛,泌乳期平均为 227 天,被分为 6 组,每组 36 头,其中 2 组随机分配到 3 种饲养策略中的每一种:(1)奶牛放牧多年生黑麦草草地,补饲在挤奶厅粉碎的大麦谷物和在围场提供的青贮饲料(对照);(2)相同的草地和分配,补饲相同数量的粉碎大麦谷物和青贮饲料,但在每次挤奶后作为混合日粮提供(PMR1);(3)相同的草地和分配,补充由粉碎的大麦谷物、紫花苜蓿干草、玉米青贮饲料和压碎的玉米粒组成的混合日粮(PMR2)。对于所有策略,补充饲料提供相同的可代谢能量和谷物:饲料比例。[75:25,干物质(DM)基础]。每组 36 头牛进一步分为 4 组,每组 9 头,分别每天接受 6、8、10 或 12 公斤补充 DM/牛。因此,每种补充饲料量和每种饲养策略都有 2 个重复组。实验有 14 天的适应期和 11 天的测量期。所有奶牛的草地分配量约为 14 公斤 DM/d,除补充饲料外,还提供额外的饲料。对于所有 3 种补充饲料喂养策略的奶牛,产奶量、能量校正奶(ECM)、脂肪和蛋白质均呈现出随补充量增加的二次正响应,脂肪和蛋白质浓度呈现出线性正响应。在任何补充量下,补饲策略组之间的产奶量、ECM 或蛋白质均无差异,但在最高补充量时,PMR2 奶牛的产奶量和脂肪浓度高于对照组和 PMR1 奶牛。当大量补饲时,PMR2 奶牛的边际 ECM 产量每增加 1 公斤补充剂的反应也大于对照组和 PMR1 奶牛。对于所有日粮,瘤胃液挥发性脂肪酸和 pH 值都有明显的日变化,尤其是在喂食最大量补充剂的奶牛中。结论是,当给放牧奶牛补饲时,传统的在挤奶厅喂谷物和在围场喂饲草的策略与简单地将谷物和青贮饲料混合相比没有益处。然而,如果该策略使用包含紫花苜蓿干草、玉米青贮饲料和玉米粒的等能量日粮,那么牛奶脂肪产量和边际牛奶产量的反应可以更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验