Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Feb 15;111(4):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Several clinically available cardiac biomarkers have established their prognostic value in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, their relative prognostic significance in stable subjects has not been prospectively validated, either individually or in combination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which B-type natriuretic peptide, myeloperoxidase, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein alone or together could be prognostic biomarkers in 3,635 consecutive stable patients without acute coronary syndrome who underwent elective diagnostic coronary angiography. After adjusting for traditional risk factors and renal function, each of the markers monitored was a significant predictor of incident major adverse cardiovascular events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke) over 3 years. A cardiac biomarker score based on the sum total of "positive" biomarkers provided independent prediction of future risk for incident major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years (hazard ratio [HR] 7.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.98 to 11.65, p <0.001), even after adjusted for traditional risk factors (HR 6.11, 95% CI 3.98 to 9.38, p <0.001). A positive cardiac biomarker score remained a strong and independent predictor of 3-year risk for major adverse cardiovascular events among those with normal glycemic control (HR 4.24, 95% CI 1.96 to 9.18, p <0.001), those with prediabetes (HR 7.62, 95% CI 3.87 to 15.01, p <0.001), and those with diabetes (HR 5.61, 95% CI 2.55 to 12.33, p <0.001), as well as within subjects without significant angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease (HR 10.82, 95% CI 3.82 to 30.6, p <0.001). In conclusion, an integrated assessment of cardiac biomarkers may provide independent prognostic value for long-term adverse clinical events in stable cardiac patients.
几种临床上可用的心脏生物标志物已在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中确立了其预后价值。然而,它们在稳定患者中的相对预后意义,无论是单独使用还是联合使用,都没有前瞻性验证。本研究旨在评估在 3635 例接受选择性诊断性冠状动脉造影的无急性冠状动脉综合征的连续稳定患者中,B 型利钠肽、髓过氧化物酶和高敏 C 反应蛋白单独或联合使用作为预后生物标志物的程度。在调整传统危险因素和肾功能后,每个监测的标志物都是 3 年内发生主要不良心血管事件(死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和中风)的显著预测因子。基于“阳性”标志物总和的心脏生物标志物评分可独立预测 3 年内发生主要不良心血管事件的未来风险(风险比 [HR] 7.61,95%置信区间 [CI] 4.98 至 11.65,p <0.001),即使在调整传统危险因素后(HR 6.11,95%CI 3.98 至 9.38,p <0.001)也是如此。即使在血糖控制正常的患者(HR 4.24,95%CI 1.96 至 9.18,p <0.001)、糖尿病前期患者(HR 7.62,95%CI 3.87 至 15.01,p <0.001)和糖尿病患者(HR 5.61,95%CI 2.55 至 12.33,p <0.001)中,以及在无明显冠状动脉疾病血管造影证据的患者中(HR 10.82,95%CI 3.82 至 30.6,p <0.001),阳性心脏生物标志物评分仍然是长期不良临床事件的独立预后指标。总之,心脏生物标志物的综合评估可为稳定型心脏患者的长期不良临床事件提供独立的预后价值。