Verges J, Desgrez J P, Claude J M, Cabane H
Service de Chirurgie-Urologie, Hôpital Gouin, Clichy.
Ann Urol (Paris). 1990;24(1):73-5.
Since 1980, in addition to internal urethrotomy, the authors have used urethrotomy combined with endoscopic resection of the stricture. This method consists of a classical first stage of section of the stricture, but only at 11 o'clock and at 1 o'clock to leave a rail of midline fibrosis. The second stage consists of resection of this rail. The value of this approach consists of more effective excision of the fibro-inflammatory callus. Thirty-four patients treated by this method have a follow-up exceeding 5 years. This series was compared with a series of patients treated by internal urethrotomy alone (39 patients with a follow-up greater than 5 years). Very good results were obtained in 55% of cases versus 28% with internal urethrotomy alone. Poor results were obtained in 32% of cases versus 43%. Internal urethrotomy therefore appears to be more rapidly and more completely effective.
自1980年以来,除了内尿道切开术,作者还采用了尿道切开术联合内镜下狭窄切除术。该方法包括经典的第一阶段,即切开狭窄,但仅在11点和1点处留下一条中线纤维化带。第二阶段包括切除这条带。这种方法的价值在于能更有效地切除纤维炎性硬结。采用该方法治疗的34例患者随访时间超过5年。该系列与仅接受内尿道切开术治疗的一系列患者(39例随访时间超过5年)进行了比较。55%的病例取得了非常好的效果,而仅行内尿道切开术的病例为28%。32%的病例效果较差,而仅行内尿道切开术的为43%。因此,内尿道切开术似乎起效更快且更彻底有效。