• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石取石术联合逆行肾盂输尿管镜检查:被遗忘的技术重新审视。

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with retrograde nephrostomy access: a forgotten technique revisited.

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of Manitoba Health Sciences Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1753-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.169. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.169
PMID:23219545
Abstract

PURPOSE

We retrospectively assessed outcomes in a single institution series of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using retrograde nephrostomy access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the records of 333 consecutive patients treated between May 2003 and July 2008. Measured variables included patient demographics, retrograde nephrostomy site, postoperative drainage, operative time, stone clearance rate and degree, requirement for secondary procedures, stone composition and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 333 patients were included in study, including 162 females and 171 males with a median age of 56 years (range 17 to 87). Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1 to 13). Antegrade access was required in 14 patients (4%) due to difficult or suboptimal anatomy. A nephrostomy tube was placed in 33 of 329 patients (10%), mainly for postoperative irrigation. Mean operative time was 76 minutes (range 25 to 246). Of the patients 79% achieved complete clearance, 19% had residual fragments 4 mm or less and 2% had significant persistent stones greater than 4 mm. Postoperatively 11 patients (3%) required shock wave lithotripsy. Analysis revealed calcium oxalate in 57% of stones, uric acid in 24%, struvite in 5% (infection stones) and other in 21%. Complications included 4 patients (1%) with significant postoperative hemorrhage, including angioembolization in 2, transfusion of 4 U packed red blood cells in 1 and observation in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The retrograde technique to establish a percutaneous nephrostomy tract for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective with stone clearance and complication rates comparable to those of antegrade access.

摘要

目的

我们回顾性评估了单中心经逆行肾造瘘途径行经皮肾镜取石术的结果。

材料和方法

我们回顾性评估了 2003 年 5 月至 2008 年 7 月期间治疗的 333 例连续患者的记录。测量变量包括患者人口统计学、逆行肾造瘘部位、术后引流、手术时间、结石清除率和程度、需要二次手术、结石成分和并发症。

结果

共有 333 例患者纳入研究,包括 162 例女性和 171 例男性,中位年龄为 56 岁(范围 17 至 87 岁)。中位住院时间为 2 天(范围 1 至 13 天)。由于解剖困难或不理想,14 例患者(4%)需要逆行入路。329 例患者中有 33 例(10%)放置了肾造瘘管,主要用于术后冲洗。平均手术时间为 76 分钟(范围 25 至 246 分钟)。79%的患者结石完全清除,19%的患者结石残留碎片为 4 毫米或更小,2%的患者有明显的持续性大于 4 毫米的结石。术后 11 例(3%)患者需要行体外冲击波碎石术。分析显示,57%的结石为草酸钙,24%为尿酸,5%为鸟粪石(感染性结石),21%为其他结石。并发症包括 4 例(1%)患者出现明显术后出血,其中 2 例需要血管栓塞,1 例需要输注 4 单位浓缩红细胞,1 例仅需观察。

结论

逆行技术建立经皮肾造瘘途径行经皮肾镜取石术是安全有效的,结石清除率和并发症发生率与顺行入路相当。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with retrograde nephrostomy access: a forgotten technique revisited.经皮肾镜碎石取石术联合逆行肾盂输尿管镜检查:被遗忘的技术重新审视。
J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1753-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.169. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
2
Infundibular stenosis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后漏斗部狭窄
J Urol. 2002 Jan;167(1):35-8.
3
Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?既往体外冲击波碎石术是否会影响经皮肾镜取石术的操作及结果?
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
4
Retrograde nephrostomy access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a simple and safe technique.逆行肾盂穿刺入路经皮肾镜取石术:一种简单、安全的技术。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Apr;48(2):175-181. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01135-z. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
5
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric population.儿科人群的经皮肾镜取石术。
J Urol. 1999 Nov;162(5):1721-4.
6
Comparison of nephrostomy drainage types following percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: single tube versus multiple tubes versus tubeless.经皮肾镜取石术需建立多条通道后的肾造瘘引流类型比较:单管引流与多管引流与无管引流。
Urol Int. 2011;87(1):23-7. doi: 10.1159/000324264. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
Challenge of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal neuropathy.脊髓神经病患者经皮肾镜取石术的挑战
Int J Urol. 2006 Jul;13(7):874-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01431.x.
8
Aggressive approach to staghorn calculi-safety and efficacy of multiple tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy.鹿角形结石的积极治疗方法——多通道经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性
Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1039-42. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.072. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
9
Nephrostomy tube-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients with large stones and staghorn stones.无肾造瘘管经皮肾镜取石术治疗大结石和鹿角形结石患者
Urology. 2006 Jan;67(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.050.
10
Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.质疑无管经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的合理性:早期拔管与无管经皮肾镜碎石术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(7):1045-8; discussion 1048-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09223.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study of Mono J Single-Step Versus Two-Step Balloon Nephrostomy Placement for Urinary Tract Obstruction: Efficiency, Tolerability, and Complication Rates.单步Mono J与两步法球囊肾造瘘术治疗尿路梗阻的比较研究:效率、耐受性及并发症发生率
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 14;14(12):4231. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124231.
2
Current Trends in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in China: A Spot Survey.中国经皮肾镜取石术的当前趋势:一项抽样调查。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jun 16;14:2507-2515. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S301484. eCollection 2021.
3
Effectiveness and safety of four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis.
经皮肾镜取石术四种通道扩张方法的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Apr;19(4):2661-2671. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8486. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
Retrograde nephrostomy access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a simple and safe technique.逆行肾盂穿刺入路经皮肾镜取石术:一种简单、安全的技术。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Apr;48(2):175-181. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01135-z. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
5
Current trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an internet-based survey.经皮肾镜取石术的当前趋势:一项基于互联网的调查。
Ther Adv Urol. 2017 Aug 15;9(9-10):219-226. doi: 10.1177/1756287217724726. eCollection 2017 Sep-Oct.
6
Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.全无管、无管、小口径造瘘管及标准经皮肾镜取石术的术中及术后可行性与安全性:一项对16项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Urol. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x.
7
Is tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy a feasible technique for the treatment of staghorn calculi?无管经皮肾镜取石术是治疗鹿角形结石的可行技术吗?
Korean J Urol. 2013 Oct;54(10):693-6. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.10.693. Epub 2013 Oct 15.