University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;34(1):40-8. doi: 10.1086/668780. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Comparison of studies evaluating patient-to-patient transmission of organisms is difficult, given the lack of standardized criteria. We used fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli (FQREC) as a model to characterize variability in definitions of relatedness across studies and to evaluate the resultant impact on study conclusions.
Narrative review and cohort study.
The narrative review compared relatedness criteria across studies of FQREC. Additionally, an existing database was used to compare relatedness of isolates on the basis of molecular criteria alone versus molecular plus clinical criteria with different temporal cutoffs (hospitalization overlap of ≥1 day or allowance for nonoverlap of hospitalization dates of ≤7 days or ≤30 days).
Forty-six articles met narrative review inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies exclusively utilized molecular criteria to define relatedness. Thirty studies included molecular and clinical criteria. Of these, 6 included temporal data (ie, time period of isolate identification), 10 included patient location, and 14 included proximity and temporal criteria. For the database analysis, 353 patients were colonized with FQREC. There were 2 main clusters containing 48 and 17 related isolates within 49 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types. Among the clusters, 18.4% of isolates were related by molecular criteria. Incorporating clinical criteria, fewer isolates were considered related: 5.7% of isolates using 30-day criteria, 3.1% using 7-day criteria, and 1.4% using 1-day overlap.
There is considerable variability in definitions of relatedness of FQREC. Utilizing molecular criteria alone to define relatedness overestimates transmission compared with definitions including clinical criteria. Standard definitions of relatedness in studies of antimicrobial-resistant organisms are needed.
由于缺乏标准化标准,比较评估患者之间传播生物体的研究具有一定难度。我们使用氟喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌(FQREC)作为模型,以确定研究之间对相关性的定义的变异性,并评估对研究结论的影响。
叙述性综述和队列研究。
叙述性综述比较了 FQREC 研究中相关性标准。此外,还利用现有数据库,根据分子标准单独比较分离物的相关性,以及根据分子加临床标准,与不同的时间截止(住院重叠≥1 天或允许住院日期不重叠≤7 天或≤30 天)进行比较。
46 篇文章符合叙述性综述纳入标准。16 项研究仅使用分子标准来定义相关性。30 项研究包括分子和临床标准。其中,6 项研究包括时间数据(即分离物鉴定的时间段),10 项研究包括患者位置,14 项研究包括接近度和时间标准。在数据库分析中,353 名患者定植了 FQREC。有 2 个主要聚类,包含 49 个脉冲场凝胶电泳类型中的 48 个和 17 个相关分离物。在这些聚类中,18.4%的分离物通过分子标准相关。纳入临床标准后,认为更多的分离物具有相关性:30 天标准下为 5.7%,7 天标准下为 3.1%,1 天重叠下为 1.4%。
FQREC 的相关性定义存在很大差异。单独使用分子标准定义相关性与包括临床标准的定义相比,会高估传播。需要在研究抗微生物耐药性生物体时制定相关性的标准定义。