Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Mar;109(5):1416-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.00509.2012. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
The production of movement sequences requires an accurate control of muscle activation in time. How does the nervous system encode the precise timing of these movements? One possibility is that the timing of movements (temporal sequence) is an emergent property of the dynamic state of the nervous system and therefore intimately linked to a representation of the sequence of muscle commands (ordinal sequence). Alternatively, timing may be represented independently of the motor effectors and would be transferable to a new ordinal sequence. Some studies have found that a learned temporal sequence cannot be transferred to a new ordinal sequence, thus arguing for an integrated representation. Others have observed temporal transfer across movement sequences and have advocated an independent representation of temporal information. Using a modified serial reaction time task, we tested alternative models of the representation of temporal structure and the interaction between the output of separate ordinal and temporal sequence representations. Temporal transfer depended on whether a novel ordinal sequence was fixed within each test block. Our results confirm the presence of an independent representation of temporal structure and advocate a nonlinear multiplicative neural interaction of temporal and ordinal signals in the production of movements.
运动序列的产生需要肌肉激活的时间精确控制。神经系统如何对这些运动的精确时间进行编码?一种可能性是,运动的时间(时间序列)是神经系统动态状态的一个涌现性质,因此与肌肉指令序列的表示(顺序序列)密切相关。或者,定时可能独立于运动效应器表示,并且可以转移到新的顺序序列。一些研究发现,学习到的时间序列不能转移到新的顺序序列,因此支持集成表示。其他人观察到运动序列之间的时间转移,并提倡时间信息的独立表示。使用改进的序列反应时任务,我们测试了时间结构表示的替代模型以及独立的顺序和时间序列表示输出之间的相互作用。时间转移取决于在每个测试块中是否固定了新的顺序序列。我们的结果证实了时间结构的独立表示的存在,并提倡在运动产生中对时间和顺序信号进行非线性乘法神经相互作用。