The Kampong Garden of the National Tropical Botanical Garden, 4013 Douglas Road, Miami, Florida 33133, USA.
Am J Bot. 2012 Dec;99(12):1891-902. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200089. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
Longevity, or organismal life span, is determined largely by the period over which constituent cells can function metabolically. Plants, with modular organization (the ability continually to develop new organs and tissues) differ from animals, with unitary organization (a fixed body plan), and this difference is reflected in their respective life spans, potentially much longer in plants than animals. We draw attention to the observation that palm trees, as a group of monocotyledons without secondary growth comparable to that of lignophytes (plants with secondary growth from a bifacial cambium), retain by means of sustained primary growth living cells in their trunks throughout their organismal life span. Does this make palms the longest-lived trees because they can grow as individuals for several centuries? No conventional lignophyte retains living metabolically active differentiated cell types in its trunk for this length of time, even though the tree as a whole can exist for millennia. Does this contrast also imply that the long-lived cells in a palm trunk have exceptional properties, which allows this seeming immortality? We document the long-life of many tall palm species and their inherent long-lived stem cell properties, comparing such plants to conventional trees. We provide a summary of aspects of cell age and life span in animals and plants. Cell replacement is a feature of animal function, whereas conventional trees rely on active growth centers (meristems) to sustain organismal development. However, the long persistence of living cells in palm trunks is seen not as evidence for unique metabolic processes that sustain longevity, but is a consequence of unique constructional features. This conclusion suggests that the life span of plant cells is not necessarily genetically determined.
寿命,或生物体的寿命,主要由组成细胞代谢功能的时间决定。植物具有模块化组织(不断发展新器官和组织的能力),与具有单一组织(固定的身体结构)的动物不同,这种差异反映在它们各自的寿命上,植物的寿命可能比动物长得多。我们注意到一个观察结果,即棕榈树作为一组单子叶植物,没有类似于木质植物(具有双面形成层的植物)的次生生长,通过持续的初生生长,在其整个生物体的寿命过程中,它们的树干中保留了活的细胞。这是否意味着棕榈树是寿命最长的树,因为它们可以作为个体生长几个世纪?没有传统的木质植物能在其树干中保留如此长的时间的具有代谢活性的分化细胞类型,尽管整棵树可以存在几千年。这种对比是否也意味着棕榈树干中长寿的细胞具有特殊的特性,从而使其具有这种看似不朽的特性?我们记录了许多高大棕榈物种的长寿命及其内在的长寿干细胞特性,并将这些植物与传统树木进行了比较。我们总结了动植物细胞年龄和寿命的各个方面。细胞替换是动物功能的一个特征,而传统树木则依靠活跃的生长中心(分生组织)来维持生物体的发育。然而,活细胞在棕榈树干中的长期存在并不是维持长寿的独特代谢过程的证据,而是独特结构特征的结果。这一结论表明,植物细胞的寿命不一定由遗传决定。