Suppr超能文献

经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管在肠衰竭婴儿中长期肠外营养中的应用。

Peripherally inserted central catheters for long-term parenteral nutrition in infants with intestinal failure.

机构信息

Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 May;56(5):578-81. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182801e7b.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Infants with intestinal failure often require long-term central access for delivery of parenteral nutrition (PN). Traditionally, surgically placed central venous catheters (CVCs) have been used; however, the complications associated with these catheters can lead to significant morbidity. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are potentially superior to CVCs because they tend to be smaller, and can be placed without general anesthesia. The purpose of the study is to report the use of PICCs for long-term administration of PN in infants with intestinal failure and compare with previously published catheter infection and venous thrombosis rates.

METHODS

A 4-year review of infants younger than 12 months with intestinal failure and a PICC for PN delivery was performed to determine the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and PICC-associated venous thrombosis. The complication rates were compared with those reported for CVCs and PICCs in the pediatric literature.

RESULTS

A total of 45 infants with intestinal failure, receiving PN through a PICC were included in the study. Data from 95 PICCs accounting for 10,189 catheter days were collected. The overall incidence of CRBSI was 5.3/1000 catheter days and the incidence of venous thrombosis was 2.0/1000 catheter days.

CONCLUSIONS

PICCs offer an advantage over CVCs in that they can often be inserted without a general anesthesia and do not require manipulation of the vein. Given the low rate of CRBSI and venous thrombosis, we recommend PICCs for infants with intestinal failure requiring PN.

摘要

背景与目的

患有肠衰竭的婴儿通常需要长期的中心静脉通路来进行肠外营养(PN)的输送。传统上,使用手术植入的中心静脉导管(CVC);然而,这些导管相关的并发症会导致显著的发病率。经外周静脉置入的中心静脉导管(PICC)与 CVC 相比具有潜在的优势,因为它们通常更小,可以在没有全身麻醉的情况下放置。本研究的目的是报告使用 PICC 为患有肠衰竭的婴儿进行长期 PN 治疗,并与之前发表的导管感染和静脉血栓形成率进行比较。

方法

对 45 名年龄小于 12 个月的患有肠衰竭且需要 PICC 进行 PN 输送的婴儿进行了为期 4 年的回顾性研究,以确定导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)和 PICC 相关静脉血栓形成的发生率。将并发症发生率与儿科文献中 CVC 和 PICC 的报告发生率进行比较。

结果

本研究共纳入 45 名患有肠衰竭、通过 PICC 接受 PN 的婴儿。共收集了 95 根 PICC 导管的数据,共计 10189 天导管使用时间。总的 CRBSI 发生率为 5.3/1000 导管天,静脉血栓形成的发生率为 2.0/1000 导管天。

结论

PICC 与 CVC 相比具有优势,因为它们通常可以在没有全身麻醉的情况下插入,并且不需要对静脉进行操作。鉴于 CRBSI 和静脉血栓形成的发生率较低,我们建议对需要 PN 的肠衰竭婴儿使用 PICC。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验