Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Epidemiology. 2013 Jan;24(1):110-21. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318276cad7.
Recent studies have estimated the reduction in HIV-1 infectiousness with antiretroviral therapy (ART), but high-quality studies such as randomized controlled trials, accompanied by rigorous adherence counseling, are likely to overestimate the effectiveness of treatment-as-prevention in real-life settings.
We attempted to summarize the effect of ART on HIV transmission by undertaking a systematic review and meta-analysis of HIV-1 infectiousness per heterosexual partnership (incidence rate and cumulative incidence over study follow-up) estimated from prospective studies of discordant couples. We used random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates. When possible, the analyses were further stratified by direction of transmission (man-to-woman or woman-to-man) and economic setting (high- or low-income countries). Potential causes of heterogeneity of estimates were explored through subgroup analyses.
Fifty publications were included. Nine allowed comparison between ART and non-ART users within studies (ART-stratified studies), in which summary incidence rates were 3.6/100 person-years (95% confidence interval = 2.0-6.5) and 0.2/100 person-years (0.07-0.7) for non-ART- and ART-using couples, respectively (P < 0.001), constituting a 91% (79-96%) reduction in per-partner HIV-1 incidence rate with ART use. The 41 studies that did not stratify by ART use provided estimates with high levels of heterogeneity (I statistic) and few reported levels of ART use, making interpretation difficult. Nevertheless, estimates tended to be lower with ART use. Infectiousness tended to be higher for low-income than high-income settings, but there was no clear pattern by direction of transmission (man-to-woman and woman-to-man).
ART substantially reduces HIV-1 infectiousness within discordant couples, based on observational studies, and could play a major part in HIV-1 prevention efforts. However, the non-zero risk from partners receiving ART demonstrates that appropriate counseling and other risk-reduction strategies for discordant couples are still required. Additional estimates of ART effectiveness by adherence level from real-life settings will be important, especially for persons starting treatment early without symptoms.
最近的研究估计了抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)降低 HIV-1 传染性的效果,但高质量的研究,如随机对照试验,并伴有严格的依从性咨询,可能会高估治疗即预防在实际环境中的效果。
我们试图通过对来自不同性伴侣的前瞻性研究中估计的每对 HIV-1 传染性(通过研究随访期间的发病率和累积发病率来衡量)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,来总结 ART 对 HIV 传播的影响。我们使用随机效应泊松回归模型来获得汇总估计值。在可能的情况下,还根据传播方向(男传女或女传男)和经济背景(高收入和低收入国家)进一步分层分析。通过亚组分析探讨了估计值异质性的潜在原因。
共纳入 50 篇文献。其中 9 篇文献允许在研究内比较接受 ART 和未接受 ART 的人群(ART 分层研究),其中未接受 ART 和接受 ART 的伴侣的汇总发病率分别为 3.6/100 人年(95%置信区间=2.0-6.5)和 0.2/100 人年(0.07-0.7)(P<0.001),表明使用 ART 可使每对伴侣 HIV-1 发病率降低 91%(79%-96%)。41 篇未分层的研究存在高度异质性(I 统计量),且很少报告 ART 的使用情况,这使得解释变得困难。然而,使用 ART 时的估计值往往较低。传染性在低收入国家比高收入国家更高,但没有明确的传播方向(男传女和女传男)模式。
基于观察性研究,ART 可显著降低不同性伴侣中的 HIV-1 传染性,这可能在 HIV-1 预防工作中发挥重要作用。然而,接受 ART 的伴侣仍存在非零风险,这表明仍需要为不同性伴侣提供适当的咨询和其他降低风险的策略。来自现实环境的关于依从性水平的 ART 效果的额外估计将非常重要,特别是对于无症状的早期开始治疗的患者。