Gudnason Thorolfur, Hrafnkelsson Birgir, Laxdal Brynja, Kristinsson Karl G
Chief Epidemiologist's Office, Directorate of Health, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 May;45(5):397-403. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.749424. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
Day care attendance is a major risk factor for respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses in preschool children. In this study, we describe the results of a hygiene intervention cohort trial at day care centres (DCCs) on the rates of febrile, respiratory, and gastrointestinal illnesses in preschool children.
Thirty DCCs in 2 communities were included. The number of illness episodes was registered for each child every 6 months, as well as potential risk factors. The hygiene intervention was introduced in half of the DCCs and the results analysed using a multivariate mixed effects hierarchical Poisson regression model.
The study lasted 2.5 y, of which the hygiene intervention lasted 1.5 y. Two thousand three hundred and forty-nine children participated, delivering 2832 person-y. Adjusted incidence rate ratios of the illnesses at the intervention and non-intervention DCCs were not significantly different for any of the illnesses. The intervention was not more effective in children less than 3 y of age than in older children and no significant effects were seen with time. Compliance with the hygiene protocol was good as measured by the use of hygiene products and by a survey among the staff at the DCCs.
The most likely explanation for the lack of effects of the intervention is that the baseline standard of hygiene at the DCCs was probably too high for the intervention to demonstrate significant results, but recall bias cannot be excluded. Even though hygiene is important for minimizing the spread of microbes at DCCs, other risk factors need to be studied.
日托机构入托是学龄前儿童患呼吸道和胃肠道疾病的主要风险因素。在本研究中,我们描述了一项在日托中心(DCCs)进行的卫生干预队列试验对学龄前儿童发热性疾病、呼吸道疾病和胃肠道疾病发病率的影响结果。
纳入了2个社区的30个日托中心。每6个月记录每个儿童的疾病发作次数以及潜在风险因素。在一半的日托中心引入卫生干预措施,并使用多变量混合效应分层泊松回归模型分析结果。
研究持续了2.5年,其中卫生干预持续了1.5年。2349名儿童参与,共提供了2832人年的数据。干预组和非干预组日托中心任何疾病的调整发病率比均无显著差异。该干预措施对3岁以下儿童并不比对年龄较大儿童更有效,且未观察到随时间的显著影响。通过卫生用品的使用情况以及对日托中心工作人员的调查来衡量,对卫生协议的依从性良好。
干预措施缺乏效果的最可能解释是,日托中心的基线卫生标准可能过高,以至于干预措施无法显示出显著效果,但不能排除回忆偏倚。尽管卫生对于最大限度减少日托中心微生物传播很重要,但其他风险因素仍需研究。