Qureshi Adnan I
Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Neuroimaging. 2013 Jul;23(3):401-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00709.x. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
To determine the interobserver reliability of a newly proposed classification scheme for angiographic classification of spinal vascular malformations including arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).
A study was performed done in which 1-2 representative angiographic images of 26 spinal AVFs and/or AVMs were independently classified by five fellows in the ACGME accredited Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology (ESN) program and two external interventionalists in the absence of any other clinical or imaging data. From these observations the interobserver reliability for each category and the overall scheme were determined in terms of the median weighted kappa statistic.
The overall interobserver reliability for the new classification scheme was a Kappa of 0.53 (Z = 21.3, P = <.0001) among the seven raters. The Kappa for individual grades was as follows: grade I (k = 0.66), grade II (k = 0.50), grade III (k = 0.44), and grade IV (k = 0.58). Three or more raters agreed on 100% of the cases. The interobserver reliability was high among the two practicing interventionalist raters (k = 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.8). The interobserver reliability remained high among junior ESN fellows (k = 0.65).
The new classification scheme provided satisfactory reliability even in the hands of less experienced observers. The scheme can be used with minimal training and other concurrent data and can be relied upon to provide consistent results.
确定一种新提出的用于脊柱血管畸形(包括动静脉瘘(AVF)和动静脉畸形(AVM))血管造影分类方案的观察者间可靠性。
进行了一项研究,在没有任何其他临床或影像数据的情况下,由ACGME认可的血管内手术神经放射学(ESN)项目中的五名研究员和两名外部介入专家对26例脊柱AVF和/或AVM的1 - 2张代表性血管造影图像进行独立分类。根据这些观察结果,通过中位数加权kappa统计量确定每个类别和总体方案的观察者间可靠性。
在七名评估者中,新分类方案的总体观察者间可靠性的kappa值为0.53(Z = 21.3,P = <.0001)。各个等级的kappa值如下:I级(k = 0.66),II级(k = 0.50),III级(k = 0.44),IV级(k = 0.58)。在100%的病例中,有三名或更多评估者意见一致。两名执业介入专家评估者之间的观察者间可靠性较高(k = 0.55,95%置信区间0.3 - 0.8)。初级ESN研究员之间的观察者间可靠性也较高(k = 0.65)。
即使在经验较少的观察者手中,新分类方案也具有令人满意的可靠性。该方案只需最少的培训和其他并行数据即可使用,并且可以依靠它提供一致的结果。