Geographic variation in CKD prevalence and ESRD incidence in the United States: results from the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study.

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether geographic differences in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease exist and are associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) incidence rates across the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional and ecologic.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: White (n = 16,410) and black (n = 11,109) participants from across the continental United States in the population-based Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.

PREDICTOR

Geographic region, defined by the 18 networks of the US ESRD Network Program.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Albuminuria, defined as albumin-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), defined as <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), were measured in the REGARDS Study. ESRD incidence rates were obtained from the US Renal Data System.

RESULTS

For whites, the network-specific prevalence of albuminuria ranged from 8.4% (95% CI, 3.3%-13.5%) in Network 15 to 14.8% (95% CI, 8.0%-21.6%) in Network 3, and decreased eGFR ranged from 4.3% (95% CI, 2.0%-6.6%) in Network 4 to 16.7% (95% CI, 12.7%-20.7%) in Network 7. For blacks, the prevalence of albuminuria ranged from 12.1% (95% CI, 8.7%-15.5%) in Network 5 to 26.5% (95% CI, 16.7%-36.3%) in Network 4, and decreased eGFR ranged from 6.7% (95% CI, 5.0%-8.4%) in Network 17/18 to 13.4% (95% CI, 7.8%-19.1%) in Network 12. Spearman correlation coefficients for the prevalence of albuminuria and decreased eGFR with network-specific ESRD incidence rates were 0.49 and 0.24, respectively, for whites and 0.29 and 0.25, respectively, for blacks.

LIMITATIONS

There were few cases of albuminuria and decreased eGFR in some geographic regions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, substantial geographic variations in the prevalence of albuminuria and decreased eGFR exist, but were correlated only modestly with ESRD incidence, suggesting the chronic kidney disease burden may not explain the geographic variation in ESRD incidence.