Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Infect Dis. 2013 Mar 1;207(5):721-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis745. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
The reasons for the unusual age-specific mortality patterns of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic remain unknown. Here we characterize pandemic-related mortality by single year of age in a unique statewide Kentucky data set and explore breakpoints in the age curves.
Individual death certificates from Kentucky during 1911-1919 were abstracted by medically trained personnel. Pandemic-associated excess mortality rates were calculated by subtracting observed rates during pandemic months from rates in previous years, separately for each single year of age and by sex.
The age profile of excess mortality risk in fall 1918 was characterized by a maximum among infants, a minimum at ages 9-10 years, a maximum at ages 24-26 years, and a second minimum at ages 56-59 years. The excess mortality risk in young adults had been greatly attenuated by winter 1919. The age breakpoints of mortality risk did not differ between males and females.
The observed mortality breakpoints in male and female cohorts born during 1859-1862, 1892-1894, and 1908-1909 did not coincide with known dates of historical pandemics. The atypical age mortality patterns of the 1918-1919 pandemic cannot be explained by military crowding, war-related factors, or prior immunity alone and likely result from a combination of unknown factors.
1918-1919 年流感大流行中不同年龄组死亡率的特殊模式的原因仍不清楚。在这里,我们通过肯塔基州全州范围内的独特数据集,按年龄特征描述大流行相关的死亡率,并探索年龄曲线的转折点。
由医学专业人员从肯塔基州 1911-1919 年的个人死亡证明中提取数据。通过将大流行月份的观察死亡率与前几年的死亡率相减,分别按性别和每个年龄组计算大流行相关的超额死亡率。
1918 年秋季超额死亡率的年龄特征表现为婴儿死亡率最高,9-10 岁时最低,24-26 岁时最高,56-59 岁时再次出现最低值。1919 年冬季,年轻人的超额死亡风险已大大降低。死亡率风险的年龄转折点在男性和女性之间没有差异。
在 1859-1862 年、1892-1894 年和 1908-1909 年出生的男性和女性队列中观察到的死亡率转折点与已知的历史大流行日期不一致。1918-1919 年大流行的非典型年龄死亡率模式不能仅用军事拥挤、与战争相关的因素或先前的免疫力来解释,很可能是由未知因素共同作用的结果。