Department of Management and Marketing, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0225, USA.
J Nurs Adm. 2013 Jan;43(1):50-5. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827860ff.
The purpose of this study was to validate a new tool to measure nursing workarounds.
Workarounds are situations where one experiences a block in workflow and, rather than complete the work process as intended, creates an idiosyncratic solution to get around the block. There are limited options for validated measures of workarounds for researchers and administrators.
To validate the tool, we conducted a survey of registered nurses that included the newly developed tool of workarounds, and measures of deviance and job crafting.
We found evidence for the content, factorial, discriminant, and criterion-related validity of the new workaround tool. Furthermore, the tool demonstrated adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
Interest in workarounds has been rapidly growing; however, high-quality research in this area has been limited by an inability to validly measure workarounds. This study represents an important step in fostering new research in workarounds.
本研究旨在验证一种新的测量护理工作回避的工具。
工作回避是指在工作流程中遇到障碍时,人们不是按照预期完成工作流程,而是创造出一种特殊的解决方案来绕过障碍的情况。对于研究人员和管理人员来说,验证工作回避措施的选择有限。
为了验证该工具,我们对注册护士进行了一项调查,其中包括新开发的工作回避工具,以及偏差和工作重塑的测量。
我们发现新工作回避工具具有内容、因子、判别和效标关联效度的证据。此外,该工具表现出足够的内部一致性和重测信度。
对工作回避的兴趣迅速增长;然而,由于无法有效地测量工作回避,该领域的高质量研究受到限制。这项研究是促进工作回避新研究的重要一步。