Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Suite 4.294, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1617-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2638-0. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
In gastrointestinal surgery, specifically in bariatric surgery, there are many types of fixed bands used for restriction and there are a multitude reasons that might eventually be an impetus for the removal of those bands. Bands consisting of Marlex or non silastic materials can be extremely difficult to remove. Intraoperative complications removing fixed bands include the difficulty in locating the band, inability to remove all of the band, and damage to surrounding structures including gastrotomies. Removal of eroded bands endoscopically may pose less risk. Potentially, forced erosion may be an easier modality than surgery, allowing revision without having to deal with the actual band at the time of definitive revision surgery.
A retrospective case series developed from a university single institution bariatric practice setting was utilized. Endpoints for the study include success of band removal, complications, length of time the stent was present, and the type of stent.
A total of 15 consecutive cases utilizing endoscopic stenting to actively induce fixed gastric band erosion for subsequent endoscopic removal were reviewed. There was an 87 % success rate in complete band removal with partial removal of the remaining bands that resolved the patient's symptoms. A complication rate of 27 % was recorded among the 15 patients, consisting of pain and/or nausea and vomiting. The mean time period of the placement of the stent prior to removal or attempted removal was 16.3 days.
Endoscopic forced erosion of fixed gastric bands is feasible, safe, and may offer an advantage over laparoscopic removal. This technique is especially applicable for gastric obstruction from fixed bands, prior to large and definitive revision surgeries, or anticipated hostile anatomy that might preclude an abdominal operation altogether.
在胃肠外科手术中,特别是在减重手术中,有许多种用于限制的固定带,并且有很多原因可能最终成为移除这些带的动力。由 Marlex 或非硅酮材料制成的带可能极难移除。移除固定带的术中并发症包括难以找到带、无法完全移除带以及对周围结构(包括胃造口)造成损伤。经内镜切除侵蚀性带可能风险较低。潜在地,强制侵蚀可能比手术更容易,允许在进行确定性修正手术时不必处理实际的带即可进行修正。
利用大学单机构减肥实践环境中的回顾性病例系列开发。该研究的终点包括带去除的成功率、并发症、支架存在的时间以及支架的类型。
总共对 15 例连续使用内镜支架积极诱导固定胃带侵蚀以随后进行内镜移除的病例进行了回顾。完全移除带的成功率为 87%,部分去除剩余带解决了患者的症状。在 15 例患者中记录了 27%的并发症发生率,包括疼痛和/或恶心和呕吐。在尝试移除或移除之前支架放置的平均时间为 16.3 天。
内镜强制侵蚀固定胃带是可行的、安全的,并且可能比腹腔镜移除更具优势。这种技术特别适用于因固定带引起的胃梗阻,在大型和确定性修正手术之前,或预期可能完全排除腹部手术的敌对解剖结构之前。