401 Parnassus Ave., Box 0984-PLP, San Francisco, CA 94143-0984, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(4):509-21.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been offered as a basis for criminal defenses, including insanity, unconsciousness, self-defense, diminished capacity, and sentencing mitigation. Examination of case law (e.g., appellate decisions) involving PTSD reveals that when offered as a criminal defense, PTSD has received mixed treatment in the judicial system. Courts have often recognized testimony about PTSD as scientifically reliable. In addition, PTSD has been recognized by appellate courts in U.S. jurisdictions as a valid basis for insanity, unconsciousness, and self-defense. However, the courts have not always found the presentation of PTSD testimony to be relevant, admissible, or compelling in such cases, particularly when expert testimony failed to show how PTSD met the standard for the given defense. In cases that did not meet the standard for one of the complete defenses, PTSD has been presented as a partial defense or mitigating circumstance, again with mixed success.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)被用作刑事辩护的依据,包括精神错乱、无意识、自卫、能力减弱和量刑减轻。对涉及 PTSD 的案例法(例如上诉裁决)的审查表明,当作为刑事辩护提出时,PTSD 在司法系统中受到了混合对待。法院经常承认有关 PTSD 的证词在科学上是可靠的。此外,美国司法管辖区的上诉法院已经承认 PTSD 是精神错乱、无意识和自卫的有效依据。然而,法院并非总是认为在这些案件中 PTSD 证言具有相关性、可采性或说服力,特别是当专家证言未能表明 PTSD 如何符合给定辩护的标准时。在不符合完整辩护标准的案件中,PTSD 被作为部分辩护或减轻情节提出,同样取得了喜忧参半的结果。