• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住房优先支持计划对频繁使用医疗住院和清醒服务的密集使用者的住房影响的初步研究。

A pilot study of the impact of housing first-supported housing for intensive users of medical hospitalization and sobering services.

机构信息

King County Mental Health and Chemical Abuse and Dependency Services, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb;103(2):316-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300867. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300867
PMID:23237150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3558756/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined changes in service use in a Housing First (HF) pilot program for adults who were homeless with medical illnesses and high prior acute-care use relative to a similar comparison group.

METHODS

We used a 1-year pre-post comparison group design. The 29 participants and 31 comparison group members were adults who were homeless with inpatient claims of at least $10 000 or at least 60 sobering "sleep off" center contacts in the prior year.

RESULTS

Participants showed a significantly greater reduction in emergency department and sobering center use relative to the comparison group. At a trend level, participants had greater reductions in hospital admissions and jail bookings. Reductions in estimated costs for participants and comparison group members were $62 504 and $25 925 per person per year-a difference of $36 579, far outweighing program costs of $18 600 per person per year.

CONCLUSIONS

HF participants showed striking reductions in acute-care use relative to the comparison group, demonstrating that HF can be a successful model for people with complex medical conditions and high prior acute-care use. Despite notable methodological limitations, these findings could be used to inform a larger multisite study that would establish greater generalizability.

摘要

目的

我们考察了住房优先(HF)试点项目中患有医疗疾病且既往急性护理使用率较高的无家可归成年人的服务使用变化情况,与类似的对照组进行了比较。

方法

我们采用了 1 年前后比较组设计。29 名参与者和 31 名对照组成员均为患有住院费用至少为 10000 美元或在前一年至少有 60 次清醒中心“清醒”记录的无家可归成年人。

结果

与对照组相比,参与者的急诊和清醒中心使用率显著降低。在趋势水平上,参与者的住院和监禁人数有所减少。参与者和对照组成员的估计成本减少额分别为每人每年 62504 美元和 25925 美元,相差 36579 美元,远远超过每人每年 18600 美元的项目成本。

结论

HF 参与者与对照组相比,急性护理使用率显著降低,表明 HF 可以成为患有复杂医疗状况和既往急性护理使用率较高人群的成功模式。尽管存在明显的方法学限制,但这些发现可以用于为更大的多地点研究提供信息,从而提高普遍性。

相似文献

1
A pilot study of the impact of housing first-supported housing for intensive users of medical hospitalization and sobering services.住房优先支持计划对频繁使用医疗住院和清醒服务的密集使用者的住房影响的初步研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb;103(2):316-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300867. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
2
Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial.住房与病例管理项目对慢性病无家可归成年人急诊就诊和住院情况的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 May 6;301(17):1771-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.561.
3
Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems.为患有严重酒精问题的长期无家可归者提供住房前后的医疗保健和公共服务使用情况及成本。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1349-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.414.
4
Effectiveness of a housing support team intervention with a recovery-oriented approach on hospital and emergency department use by homeless people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial.以康复为导向的住房支持团队干预对严重精神疾病 homeless 人群住院和急诊使用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Sep 30;29:e169. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000785.
5
Housing the chronically homeless: high hopes, complex realities.安置长期无家可归者:厚望与复杂现实。
JAMA. 2009 May 6;301(17):1822-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.596.
6
Impact of permanent supportive housing on the use of acute care health services by homeless adults.永久性支持性住房对无家可归成年人急性护理医疗服务使用情况的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jul;57(7):992-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.7.992.
7
A randomized trial of permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless persons with high use of publicly funded services.一项针对长期无家可归且高度依赖公共资金服务的慢性患者的永久性支持性住房的随机试验。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):797-806. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13553.
8
Housing First is associated with reduced use of emergency medical services.“住房优先”模式与减少紧急医疗服务的使用有关。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):476-82. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.916020. Epub 2014 May 30.
9
Long-term effects of rent supplements and mental health support services on housing and health outcomes of homeless adults with mental illness: extension study of the At Home/Chez Soi randomised controlled trial.租金补贴和心理健康支持服务对患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人住房和健康状况的长期影响:“在家/在自己家”随机对照试验的扩展研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;6(11):915-925. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30371-2. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
The effects of respite care for homeless patients: a cohort study.为无家可归患者提供临时护理的效果:一项队列研究。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1278-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067850. Epub 2006 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
"Especially being homeless, they just think you're infected with COVID or something": A qualitative exploration of the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on people experiencing homelessness with a history of injection drug use in Baltimore, Maryland.“尤其是无家可归者,他们就认为你感染了新冠病毒之类的病”:对新冠疫情对马里兰州巴尔的摩有注射吸毒史的无家可归者影响的定性探索
Hous Policy Debate. 2024 Jul 30. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2024.2378807.
2
People experiencing homelessness requiring psychiatric review in prison, a study of a male and female remand prison over 1 year period.一项针对一所男女还押监狱为期1年的研究,研究对象为在监狱中需要接受精神病学评估的无家可归者。
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03938-z.
3
The Interactive Care Coordination and Navigation mHealth Intervention for People Experiencing Homelessness: Cost Analysis, Exploratory Financial Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Budget Impact Analysis.针对无家可归者的互动式护理协调与导航移动健康干预措施:成本分析、探索性财务成本效益分析及预算影响分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 18;9:e64973. doi: 10.2196/64973.
4
The effectiveness of abstinence-based and harm reduction-based interventions in reducing problematic substance use in adults who are experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.高收入国家中针对无家可归成年人减少问题性物质使用的基于禁欲和减少伤害干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:一项系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 21;20(2):e1396. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1396. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Permanent Supportive Housing Receipt and Health Care Use Among Adults With Disabilities.永久性支持性住房券的获取与残疾成年人的医疗保健使用情况。
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Dec;80(6):596-607. doi: 10.1177/10775587231183192. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
6
Accommodation-based interventions for individuals experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, homelessness.针对正在经历或有经历无家可归风险的个人的基于住宿的干预措施。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;17(2):e1165. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1165. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Optimising Access to Healthcare for Patients Experiencing Homelessness in Hospital Emergency Departments.优化医院急诊部门中无家可归患者的医疗服务获取
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;20(3):2424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032424.
9
Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.种族健康公平与社会需求干预:一项系统评价综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250654. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50654.
10
Social service providers' perspectives on caring for structurally vulnerable hospital patients who use drugs: a qualitative study.社会服务提供者照顾使用毒品的结构性脆弱住院患者的观点:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 8;22(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08498-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with use of urban emergency departments by the U.S. homeless population.与美国无家可归人群使用城市急救部门相关的因素。
Public Health Rep. 2010 May-Jun;125(3):398-405. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500308.
2
Substance use outcomes among homeless clients with serious mental illness: comparing Housing First with Treatment First programs. homeless 客户严重精神疾病物质使用结果:比较优先住房与优先治疗方案。
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Apr;47(2):227-32. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9283-7. Epub 2010 Jan 9.
3
Housing the chronically homeless: high hopes, complex realities.安置长期无家可归者:厚望与复杂现实。
JAMA. 2009 May 6;301(17):1822-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.596.
4
Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial.住房与病例管理项目对慢性病无家可归成年人急诊就诊和住院情况的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 May 6;301(17):1771-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.561.
5
A cost analysis of San Diego County's REACH program for homeless persons.圣地亚哥县针对无家可归者的“拓展计划”成本分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):445-50. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.4.445.
6
Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems.为患有严重酒精问题的长期无家可归者提供住房前后的医疗保健和公共服务使用情况及成本。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1349-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.414.
7
Housing First for long-term shelter dwellers with psychiatric disabilities in a suburban county: a four-year study of housing access and retention.郊区县为患有精神疾病的长期避难所居住者提供的“先住房后服务”模式:一项关于住房获取与保留的四年研究
J Prim Prev. 2007 Jul;28(3-4):265-79. doi: 10.1007/s10935-007-0093-9. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
8
Impact of permanent supportive housing on the use of acute care health services by homeless adults.永久性支持性住房对无家可归成年人急性护理医疗服务使用情况的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jul;57(7):992-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.7.992.
9
Cost-effectiveness of supported housing for homeless persons with mental illness.为患有精神疾病的无家可归者提供支持性住房的成本效益。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;60(9):940-51. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.940.
10
Emergency department use among the homeless and marginally housed: results from a community-based study.无家可归者和居住条件差者在急诊科的就诊情况:一项基于社区研究的结果
Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):778-84. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.778.