• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚处方药的可负担性:共付额和安全网门槛是否过高?

The affordability of prescription medicines in Australia: are copayments and safety net thresholds too high?

作者信息

Searles Andrew, Doran Evan, Faunce Thomas A, Henry David

机构信息

Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Hunter Valley Research Foundation, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2013 Feb;37(1):32-40. doi: 10.1071/AH11153.

DOI:10.1071/AH11153
PMID:23237385
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To create and report survey-based indicators of the affordability of prescription medicines for patients in Australia.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study of 1502 randomly selected participants in the Hunter Region of NSW, were interviewed by telephone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The self-reported financial burden of obtaining prescription medicines.

RESULTS

Data collection was completed with a response rate of 59.0%. Participants who had received and filled at least one prescription medicine in the previous 3 months, and eligible for analysis (n=952), were asked to self-report the level of financial burden from obtaining these medicines. Extreme and heavy financial burdens were reported by 2.1% and 6.8% of participants, respectively. A moderate level of burden was experienced by a further 19.5%. Low burden was recorded for participants who said that their prescription medicines presented either a slight burden (29.0%) or were no burden at all (42.6%).

CONCLUSION

A substantial minority of participants who had obtained prescription medicines in the 3 months prior to survey experienced a level of financial burden from the cost of these medicines that was reported as being moderate to extreme.

摘要

目的

创建并报告基于调查的澳大利亚患者处方药可负担性指标。

方法

对新南威尔士州猎人地区随机选取的1502名参与者进行横断面研究,通过电话进行访谈。

主要观察指标

获取处方药的自我报告财务负担。

结果

数据收集完成,应答率为59.0%。在过去3个月内至少收到并填写过一份处方药且符合分析条件的参与者(n = 952),被要求自我报告获取这些药物的财务负担水平。分别有2.1%和6.8%的参与者报告有极端和沉重的财务负担。另有19.5%的参与者经历了中等程度的负担。表示处方药带来轻微负担(29.0%)或完全没有负担(42.6%)的参与者记录为低负担。

结论

在调查前3个月内获取过处方药的相当一部分参与者,因这些药物的费用而经历了被报告为中度至极端的财务负担。

相似文献

1
The affordability of prescription medicines in Australia: are copayments and safety net thresholds too high?澳大利亚处方药的可负担性:共付额和安全网门槛是否过高?
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Feb;37(1):32-40. doi: 10.1071/AH11153.
2
Abolition of prescription charges in Wales: the impact on medicines use in those who used to pay.威尔士取消处方收费:对过去付费者用药情况的影响。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Dec;18(6):332-40. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00063.x. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
3
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme cost sharing, patient cost consciousness and prescription affordability.药品福利计划成本分摊、患者成本意识与处方可负担性。
Aust Health Rev. 2011 Feb;35(1):37-44. doi: 10.1071/AH10902.
4
Chronic conditions, financial burden and pharmaceutical pricing: insights from Australian consumers.慢性病、经济负担与药品定价:来自澳大利亚消费者的见解
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Nov;38(5):589-95. doi: 10.1071/AH13190.
5
Impact of prescription charges on people living in poverty: A qualitative study.处方收费对贫困人口的影响:一项定性研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Nov-Dec;12(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
The impact of co-payment increases on dispensings of government-subsidised medicines in Australia.澳大利亚自付费用增加对政府补贴药品配药的影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Nov;17(11):1091-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1670.
7
Older people's perceptions of prescription medicine costs and related costs: a pilot study in New Zealand.老年人对处方药费用及相关费用的看法:新西兰的一项试点研究。
J Prim Health Care. 2014 Dec 1;6(4):295-303.
8
Travelling all over the countryside: travel-related burden and financial difficulties reported by cancer patients in New South Wales and Victoria.走遍乡村:新南威尔士州和维多利亚州癌症患者报告的旅行相关负担和经济困难。
Aust J Rural Health. 2011 Dec;19(6):298-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2011.01232.x.
9
Who uses complementary and alternative therapies in regional South Australia? Evidence from the Whyalla Intergenerational Study of Health.南澳大利亚地区哪些人使用补充和替代疗法?来自怀阿拉代际健康研究的证据。
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Feb;37(1):104-11. doi: 10.1071/AH11130.
10
Clinician identification of chronically ill patients who have problems paying for prescription medications.临床医生对那些在支付处方药费用方面存在问题的慢性病患者的识别。
Am J Med. 2004 Jun 1;116(11):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient co-payments for women diagnosed with breast cancer in Australia.澳大利亚被诊断患有乳腺癌的女性的患者自付费用。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2217-2227. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05037-z. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
2
Medication adherence perspectives in haemodialysis patients: a qualitative study.血液透析患者的用药依从性观点:一项定性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2017 May 22;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0583-9.
3
Is health impact assessment useful in the context of trade negotiations? A case study of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.
健康影响评估在贸易谈判背景下是否有用?跨太平洋伙伴关系协定的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010339.
4
Progress in increasing affordability of medicines for non-communicable diseases since the introduction of mandatory health insurance in the Republic of Moldova.自摩尔多瓦共和国引入强制性医疗保险以来,在提高非传染性疾病药品可负担性方面取得的进展。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Jul;31(6):793-800. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv136. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Essential Medicines in a High Income Country: Essential to Whom?高收入国家的基本药物:对谁至关重要?
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0143654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143654. eCollection 2015.